Search results for query: *

Got home today and received this Holley E85 tester from Summit. Spot anything wrong? Hint, notice the clear sticker. Summit is replacing it

Funny how those "most experienced guys combined" aren't able tp assdemlr a well treasoned counter argument with going personal.[/USER] Make up your mind. BTW, I only comment on a topic that I feel I can contribute for the greater good, if it is more than one, deal with it. And if all you have...

Well I admit, there are people who think they are better/more entitled without basis then others, and others who fail to accept/refuse without reason that someone else maybe more in the right on a topic than themselves. I have little aversion to confronting both. I try give my reasons openly and...

I'm hearing an echo? Dadsbee stated an assumption. Why in the world would you contact TSA about and while cash carrying within our borders when your own research indicates you do not need to declare it? All you need is one agent having a bad day to ruin yours, and for what?

Wrong, do some research. No one is required or obligated to declare any amount of cash prior to seizure unless crossing US borders. Although I suspect that declaration will be seen somewhat favorably by jury at a trial to win back your seized funds.

You mean the leaders that passed the Patriot Act in 2001 that was allegedly targeting terrorism that the country widely supported, just to be accurate? It's also called unintended consequences and/or mission creep.

I believe he actually went another step up later to 315. I liked his style.:bananadance:

Surprised this hasn't been mentioned, decades back when I deposited large cash deposits (legit) over a certain threshold, the bank used to charge 1%? to count the deposit.:realcrazy: But then I reside in So Florida.:lol:

Does everyone here understand Credit Unions involved in any cash transactions of other's money are subject to the same "suspicious Activity report" requirements as any bank of any size? The only difference is how they on a case-by-case basis determine what is potentially "suspicious" that they...

Carrying a lot of cash today is a financial risk, especially at an airport where you consent to a search by the nature of boarding a plane.

One never has too much front tire, only not enough HP to get the rears loose.

And to confirm the identity of the person mentioned in the soon to be filed to the Feds "Suspicious Activity Report"? Reminds me of the lesson learned from what the Germans told those at the train station standing in the left line that they were going to the "showers", it only works if you tell...

Which is it?

That was my earlier point on this topic. The enforcement burden has been of late shifted to the banks, under the vague guise, the banks "must know the customer", and to protect their butts, we get selective enforcement and reporting. Banks are under no obligation that they need to inform a...

1. Understeer sucks? 2. 70% of your stopping force is generated by the front axle 3. 2/3 of a cars static weight is on front tires 4. Some believe form follows function Would be my first reasons.

"Structuring" in the financial sense here is withdrawing funds in smaller amounts with the intent to avoid notice or reporting to authorities that a single larger withdrawal would incur. All suggestions here by others to take that action is categorically illegal. Whether its detectable or not is...

And a good way to have it legally confiscated methinks.

The burden of proving its legit funds and the expense of proving it is on the shoulders of the original holder of the cash. The logic of that predicament in cash seizures of say less than $5k, is the cops know it will cost more than that to pay the legal fees to get the money returned, hence no...

Every Bank Wire goes thru the Feds, its effectively documented by default.

I had a bank wire withdrawn decades back, never knew that was even possible, speaking of "simple".