• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

400 P-code engine ratings

400Magnum

Well-Known Member
Local time
2:36 PM
Joined
May 9, 2011
Messages
64
Reaction score
24
Location
Grand Ledge, MI
Can someone please tell me where I can find the information about horsepower and torque ratings are for the 1978 p-code 400?

I swear I once saw this information in the factory service manual somewhere, but I can't find it now.
 
Did you try Allpar.com? I've got a very old Chilton's manual at home that gives all those specs too. I wont be there til thursday night, but if nobody has replied here before then I'll put the hp and tq #s up.
 
I jumped the gun a little. 400 4bbl was good for 190 hp @ 3600 rpm and 305 lb-ft @ 3200 rpm. The 440 was only putting out 195 but the e58 360 made 220 hp, with less torque. My 360 2bbl was rated at a whopping 185 hp. Kinda takes the mystery out of why 78 was the last year for big blocks in cars, huh. Just didn't seem to be much point anymore. Bummer.
 
Yeah, factory horse powers kinda sucked for the late B's but, ever wonder why you
could keep up with some of the older muscle cars the were suppost to have been
making more power? I did!
__________

Something you might have not known: Compare horsepower with the early cars!
Early mopars were rated as gross hp vs. the late mopars were rated as net hp.

Example:
While the late sixties early seventies were a golden age of horsepower compared
to the late seventies or early eighties, the differences weren't quite as vast as they
appear at first. A '67 Impala with the 396, rated 325 gross horsepower, probably
had something like 220 net horsepower in pure stock form.

Source:http://moparfan.com/showthread.php?tid=147&pid=1014#pid1014
 
I was going to mention that those numbers were net ratings but I guess I forgot. I'm kinda dense sometimes. The 400 was an attempt to regain some of the 383's hp losses in the early smog days, but it was never really considered a hi-performance motor, even with it's relatively large bore. I guess it depends on who you're keeping company with, though. Compared to it's contemporaries like Ford's cruddy 400 and Pontiac's 6.6, it was respectable enuff. Chevy's 400s are mostly good as crank-donors for 383 builds. HA!
 
I've done some digging around, and I get conflicting information. For instance, I have also seen the 190 hp figure mentioned in a lot of places, some places say that's for the 400 2-barrel, others sort of imply that it's for the 4-barrel. I found other places that list the 1972 400 4-barrel at 250-255 hp, which is the net rating, and they also list the 2-barrel at 190 hp. So that's what makes me think that the 190 hp rating is for the two barrel for all years. I mean, I realize that the power output of engines during this era were low, but I just don't see how a 400 4-barrel described from the factory as the high performance model would make less than .5 hp/cubic inch.

Besides, when I first got my 78 Magnum, I was all gung ho and found all kinds of information about the car. The information I found listed each engine that was available and gave the power ratings. For the P-code 400 they list it at 230 hp. They also list the 2-barrel at 190 hp.

However, in my eagerness to collect information, I failed to make a note where I found this information. All I have are the pages that I either copied out of the book or magazine or printed off of a website, but it doesn't show the name of the book or magazine or list the website so I can verify the information.

Like I said, I just find it real hard to believe a 400 listed as the high performance model makes less than half a horsepower per cubic inch, even with net ratings.
 
The source I used didn't give a breakdown by year. I have no doubt that the earlier versions were better than 190 HP, I just didn't have any other info to go on. My old Chilton's gives the info by year, I'll have to look it up.
By the time the EPA got done, .5hp per cubic inch was about the norm. The last surviving big engines ie: BOP 455, Caddy 500 and 472, Mopar 440 and whatever Ford was making, 460, I guess, couldn't even pull that off.
I didn't mean to imply that the 400 was an anemic, weak-sister mill. It was right in line with the competition at the time and has even more potential today. Unlike SOME people's 400+ Cid engines (I'm talkin' to YOU, Pontiac 401) that are better left to the scrapper.
 
Auto Transport Service
Back
Top