themechanic
Oklahoma is OK
- Local time
- 6:25 PM
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2012
- Messages
- 18,817
- Reaction score
- 23,599
- Location
- Moore, Oklahoma
For BCE66-74 $139.50 shipped (Lifetime Warranty). http://www.mitymounts.com/
I bought these based on suggestions from FBBO members and their comparison with Schumacher Magnum Poly-loc engine mounts that are supposed to be stiffer than MityMounts. The Poly-locs cost a bit more $175 shipped.
The installation was per the Dodge factory service manual (FSM) for 1969 Coronet with 440 engine. The mounts have a stock appearance and there was no change in vibration damping from the stock mounts they replaced (which were in like new condition).
One big problem with the MityMounts is the stud length was too long. I had to cut off about 3/8" (or just above the nut once bolted to the mount on the engine side) in order to fit, otherwise the bolt holes would not line up due to the stud contacting the engine.
One small problem was the threads in the nuts on both mounts needed chasing probably due to rubber residue from the manufacturing process.
Also, the metal is thinner and more flexible on the MityMounts than the stock mounts; But, not enough to matter once bolted in.
I recommend the MityMounts and would by them again.
I bought these based on suggestions from FBBO members and their comparison with Schumacher Magnum Poly-loc engine mounts that are supposed to be stiffer than MityMounts. The Poly-locs cost a bit more $175 shipped.
The installation was per the Dodge factory service manual (FSM) for 1969 Coronet with 440 engine. The mounts have a stock appearance and there was no change in vibration damping from the stock mounts they replaced (which were in like new condition).
One big problem with the MityMounts is the stud length was too long. I had to cut off about 3/8" (or just above the nut once bolted to the mount on the engine side) in order to fit, otherwise the bolt holes would not line up due to the stud contacting the engine.
One small problem was the threads in the nuts on both mounts needed chasing probably due to rubber residue from the manufacturing process.
Also, the metal is thinner and more flexible on the MityMounts than the stock mounts; But, not enough to matter once bolted in.
I recommend the MityMounts and would by them again.