• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Fuel return used as a vent safe?

RedShadow30

Well-Known Member
Local time
12:52 PM
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
100
Reaction score
8
Location
Jacksonville
Well with the temp going up i am still having issues with vacuum in the tank. So im thinking of using the fuel return on the sending unit to run a vent line like you would on a fuel cell. Is it safe to do, or has anyone else done it? I dont meen half *** it either, im talking up loop over and a splashback valve.
 
I assume then that you don't have a fuel return? You should. It would help a LOT. For the vent, just run a vented gas cap.
 
Well with the temp going up i am still having issues with vacuum in the tank. So im thinking of using the fuel return on the sending unit to run a vent line like you would on a fuel cell. Is it safe to do, or has anyone else done it? I dont meen half *** it either, im talking up loop over and a splashback valve.

Car/Year?
 
The only reason i have yet to do the vented cap is because i cant find one for a 72 charger, and a return line i cant find any instructions on how to do one with a mechanical pump. It didint have a fuel return, but i did upgrade it when i did the tank so i would have the option to put a fuel return. I just want to put a vent there just till i save up to put a propper return in. I am iching to drive it.
 
The GTX and other cars had a fuel return line on them. This took some of the fuel from the pump outlet and returned it to the fuel tank. My 69 RR does not have a fuel return line from the pump, but has 2 tank vent tubes. One vent tube allows outside air into the tank to keep it from collapsing as fuel is drawn out by the fuel pump. It is submerged in fuel most of the time, and you can hear it bubbling after a hard run as air moves back into the tank.
 
Having a return line does a few things. First it keeps a supply of cool fuel in the carburetor. It all but eliminates hard starts due to vapor lock during warm months. It also takes a tremendous load off the fuel pump. The system is no longer a "dead head" system. It makes it MUCH easier for the pump to move the fuel. Not having a return line makes it more difficult for the pump to do it's job, because it always fights it's own pressure. Installing a fuel return line reduces that dramatically. Sure, you can run without one. Many cars did for decades. But ALL modern cars use them. It's NOT just a fuel injection thing. It makes the pump last longer, whether it's electric or mechanical and can approach the driveability of fuel injection if done correctly. I wouldn't build a fuel system without one. My rat truck will even have a fuel return.

One more thing.....and this is simply personal preference. IMHO, I think it's best to have the return come off as close to the carburetor as possible. In fact, when I do a hot street or race fuel system where I run a Holley, I run Dominator float bowls, because they are drilled and tapped on BOTH the passenger's AND driver's sides. This allows you to come off the driver's side with the return line, tee them together and run back to the tank. Stick a regulator in the return line close to the carburetor to act as the orifice. This regulates prressure even on the pump side of the carburetor, just as it's designed. I think that works superior because it allows fresh fuel to constantly flow ACROSS the fuel bowls constantly circulating. If you've ever torn down a Holley and seen the secondary side all varnished up, but the primary side beautiful, there's a reason for that. People don't use the secondary side as much, so fuel sits back there and goes all to hell. This is especially true with the ethanol puke we run now.
 
The other vent tube lets pressure out of the tank as it warms up, I believe. This one is not submerged in fuel.

- - - Updated - - -

Good info there, Rusty
 
Auto Transport Service
Back
Top