Mark1972
Well-Known Member
Maybe I'm just being grumpy, but when I call a company and ask for technical advice on choosing an engine part, I expect some form of expert advice. It's been widely discussed on this and other forums that when it comes to carburetion, you can't just look at CFM. Yes, there is a formula. But I thought the formula would be a guideline. Something used to get in the ballpark. When I call Holley and Edelbrock, and ask specifically for their advice on which carb they would suggest, all I got was the CFM formula. Really guys? Am I expecting too much or what? The general consensus is the Holley 4160 750 vacuum secondary is the way to go for my 440. It's the recommendation of the engine builder. I just like doing my own research. I'm just a little disappointed that these companies tech support departments, which are supposed to be the leaders of automotive air/fuel delivery, used the CFM calculation and that was it. For what it's worth, they both suggested carbs in the 650 CFM range. Ok, I feel better.