Worth $200?those are the old factory 1.5's.
depends on how good the fulcrum area is. all those ductile iron rockers have fulcrum issues. also depends on how much lift the cam has. iron rockers have geometry issues at higher lifts.Worth $200?
depends on how good the fulcrum area is. all those ductile iron rockers have fulcrum issues. also depends on how much lift the cam has. iron rockers have geometry issues at higher lifts.
pretty sure they are a true 1.5. i haven't had any of those rockers in decades, but i've never found the mopar rocker ratio "myth" to be true; at least the ones i've checked. i know crane's 1.5"s are a true 1.6 and there 1.6's are a true 1.65. seen the same thing with harland sharps. i think the rocker ratio myth started with hugh's and everybody keeps repeating it. the only way i can figure hugh's came up with 1.38 is by checking with a hydraulic tappet with running springs installed on the heads. hydraulic tappets will collapse after a few cycles with checking springs. he's probably sold a lot of rockers over this.And they are not a true 1.5 ratio.
depends on how good the fulcrum area is. all those ductile iron rockers have fulcrum issues. also depends on how much lift the cam has. iron rockers have geometry issues at higher lifts.
I ran the Isky's for years with .585 lift & held up well. We cut the diagonal grooves in the shafts. The tip contact pattern wasn't the greatest though.