• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Small block headers suggestion/feedback

pearljam724

Well-Known Member
Local time
4:58 PM
Joined
Oct 14, 2018
Messages
1,260
Reaction score
555
Location
U.S.
Considering hugger headers for my 360. Only under circumstances that there won’t be any fitment issues installing them. I don’t want any plug issues either as far as changing them or melting off wires. This would be on a stock street car. I realize, I ll probably only get 10 percent performance gains. I want to do it mainly for sound. I have an aftermarket cam, intake and 4 barrel carb. My car sounds good as is. Opinions, is it worth it ? What is a good header with no installment or clearance headaches ? I’d like to avoid vapor lock issues too, thinking I could use heat wrap.
 
Last edited:
If I had it to do over.....no headers on my street car. changing plugs is a nightmare.:screwy:
 
The sound difference will be subjective. I've had headers on a few V8's, they seemed to give a deeper tone, but I quite like the tighter sound I have with stock manifolds on my car at the moment. Check for clearance around the starter and oil filter - you may need a mini starter and/or 90° oil filter adapter depending on header brand. You probably won't see many performance benefits until higher in the rev range. Some people also have issues with excess heat and header bolts coming loose.
 
I looked into this for Uncle Bill's 70 340 Cuda. It has some new ceramic headers on it from the guy he bought it from. We are having plug wire issues on 5 and 7.

I like the TTI shorty headers for spark plug clearance. They seem to have a shape similar to the HP manifolds for small blocks. http://www.ttiexhaust.com/MoparClassics-Headers/34025-Shorty/TTi34025.htm

TTI34025.jpg


A cheaper option by half is the Hedman tight tube headers. Supposed to fit. https://www.jegs.com/i/Hedman/500/78500/10002/-1?ymm=4294829708+4294828902+4294828898

upload_2019-10-18_18-4-40.png


500-78500_1.jpg


https://www.hedman.com/passenger-car-headers?cpable=1&&YearID=1970&MakeID=43&ModelID=2307&CID=340 Buy them cheaper at Summit or Jegs or other vendors.
 
The sound difference will be subjective. I've had headers on a few V8's, they seemed to give a deeper tone, but I quite like the tighter sound I have with stock manifolds on my car at the moment. Check for clearance around the starter and oil filter - you may need a mini starter and/or 90° oil filter adapter depending on header brand. You probably won't see many performance benefits until higher in the rev range. Some people also have issues with excess heat and header bolts coming loose.
I have a lot of room on passenger side. Looks tight in between power steering gear box and engine. It’s all bone stock, besides a few engine upgrades.
 
I looked into this for Uncle Bill's 70 340 Cuda. It has some new ceramic headers on it from the guy he bought it from. We are having plug wire issues on 5 and 7.

I like the TTI shorty headers for spark plug clearance. They seem to have a shape similar to the HP manifolds for small blocks. http://www.ttiexhaust.com/MoparClassics-Headers/34025-Shorty/TTi34025.htm

View attachment 852149

A cheaper option by half is the Hedman tight tube headers. Supposed to fit. https://www.jegs.com/i/Hedman/500/78500/10002/-1?ymm=4294829708+4294828902+4294828898

View attachment 852147

View attachment 852150

https://www.hedman.com/passenger-car-headers?cpable=1&&YearID=1970&MakeID=43&ModelID=2307&CID=340 Buy them cheaper at Summit or Jegs or other vendors.
I like those TTI’s. I agree, the collector is positioned like the stock manifolds. That makes them attractive.
My engine is a little sluggish on low end. But, mid to high rpms it makes a lot of power for a small block. I’m thinking it’s being held back a little on performance by the stock manifolds.
The 360 is a little different in reference to changing the stock heads to aluminum. Compared to a 318 or 340. The valve ports on aluminum heads are the same as 360 stock cast heads. For that reason. I don’t think swapping cast heads will help any on a 360.
 
I like those TTI’s. I agree, the collector is positioned like the stock manifolds. That makes them attractive.
My engine is a little sluggish on low end. But, mid to high rpms it makes a lot of power for a small block. I’m thinking it’s being held back a little on performance by the stock manifolds.
The 360 is a little different in reference to changing the stock heads to aluminum. Compared to a 318 or 340. The valve ports on aluminum heads are the same as 360 stock cast heads. For that reason. I don’t think swapping cast heads will help any on a 360.
Are you using HP manifolds or log manifolds?
 
I've run the same TTI shortys pictured above on a 68 Valiant. Did a whole install sticky over on A Bodies.
Honestly the easiest header install I've ever done. No plug wire problems. Outstanding fit. The engine was a 273. The sound was way better than stock. I would believe you would be happy with them.Didn't even have to remove the spark plugs or wires during the install. No need for a oil filter angle adapter, mine had one so I reused it.
IMG_2621.jpg
IMG_2649.jpg
 
Are you using HP manifolds or log manifolds?
Intake ? I think it’s called a Edlebrock RPM Performer. I also think it’s considered a dual plane, but not positive. It has 2 intake holes, rather than one big square hole. One side of the intake has a lower floor than the other. I don’t know a lot about which intakes do what. As far as, which application works best for my needs. It was on the engine. When I bought the car.
 
I've run the same TTI shortys pictured above on a 68 Valiant. Did a whole install sticky over on A Bodies.
Honestly the easiest header install I've ever done. No plug wire problems. Outstanding fit. The engine was a 273. The sound was way better than stock. I would believe you would be happy with them.Didn't even have to remove the spark plugs or wires during the install. No need for a oil filter angle adapter, mine had one so I reused it. View attachment 852180 View attachment 852181
Thank you, for your feedback. Were you able to keep the original starter too and to you they are worth the extra money spent ?
 
Yes you can but I put a small one in.If you do go with TTI make life easy and get the down pipes with them. I installed the complete system to the rear bumper.They make 2 port sizes small for the 273/318 and large for the 340/360.
Yes money well spent.
 
Intake ? I think it’s called a Edlebrock RPM Performer. I also think it’s considered a dual plane, but not positive. It has 2 intake holes, rather than one big square hole. One side of the intake has a lower floor than the other. I don’t know a lot about which intakes do what. As far as, which application works best for my needs. It was on the engine. When I bought the car.
Talking about stock exhaust manifolds.
 
Most opinions are keep stock exhaust manifolds for street use, ease of changing spark plugs and under hood heat management. Especially, if you already have HP exhaust manifolds on the car now.

If you want a good sound get Dynomax Ultra Flow mufflers (loud) or Dynomax Super Turbo (not as loud as UF). Use your $1000 you would have spent on unneeded exhaust mods on other things.

If you insist on spending the money on eaders, get TTI bare metal and wrap them. That coating does not stay shiny. Just ask me or @Dennis H.
 
Most opinions are keep stock exhaust manifolds for street use, ease of changing spark plugs and under hood heat management. Especially, if you already have HP exhaust manifolds on the car now.

If you want a good sound get Dynomax Ultra Flow mufflers (loud) or Dynomax Super Turbo (not as loud as UF). Use your $1000 you would have spent on unneeded exhaust mods on other things.

If you insist on spending the money on eaders, get TTI bare metal and wrap them. That coating does not stay shiny. Just ask me or @Dennis H.
Yeah, I think I ll put this off. My car sounds very good as is. People observing the car, love the sound. It has Flowmasters. I want a few smaller upgrades and then I’m done spending. It’s complete and a show worthy car. At this point, I’m just throwing money away. I ll get the TTI headers, if I hold onto the car for more than a few more years. These cars don’t run best when it’s over 80 degrees outside as is. No sense in warming things up under the hood. I’ve been trying to cool it down. Thanks for your insight.
 
Last edited:
I never liked the chambered muffler sound. It's a personal preference.

The Dynomax mufflers (or just about any other mufflers) will sound a lot better on your car. They're under $50 each.

http://www.dynomax.com/mufflers/super-turbo-mufflers

http://www.dynomax.com/mufflers/ultra-flo-welded-mufflers
Thanks, for pointing me into that consideration. I like the Flowmaster sound because I believe they are open on the interior ? I would think the ones you pointed out would be too quite ? But, like you said. Maybe yours sound better. One of those things you would have to hear and compare I guess. I don’t like obnoxious loud, definitely don’t like quite on this period cars either. My video I posted doesn’t depict quit an accurate sound clip.
 
what are your drivetrain and engine build specs.Looks like a hi end car!
 
what are your drivetrain and engine build specs.Looks like a hi end car!
2.94 Sure Grip. I don’t know exact engine specs, it was rebuilt before I bought it. . I did a lot of mechanical and cosmetic fixes since I bought it last November. It’s somewhat of a dog under 2500 rpms. But, I think that might be normal for the cam that might be in it and it makes it a good street car. It comes to life and pulls like a train over 2500 rpm or over 50 mph. Very good mid to top end power. I assume it makes about 350 hp. Descent for a small block.
 
Last edited:
Auto Transport Service
Back
Top