Steverino
Well-Known Member
I've been chasing valve cover leaks (among other issues) while sorting this car (again)
Same engine and heads (stock iron) sealed fine with cork and previous chrome edlebrock covers 3 yrs ago before I took it apart for body work etc
I swapped back to the original stamped steel covers from car's the orig 383
Holes and flanges didn't seem to be deformed, I gave a little tap or two on the bottom side of holes prior to assembling and painting
I had limited success with orig type felpro cork , lh side sealed well , until I retightened it (for no reason other than I looked at the specs), mistake, then that side leaked also
Black felpro VS50145R has worked well, but only when I ran a continuous smear of black rtv on both sides (the head sealing surface is looking a bit rough), so that took two gaskets to learn that on the rh side
Now I need more, because the lh side where cork failed due to tightening when I shouldn't have, I tried the blue moroso 93055 ?, dry as directed, and they recommend 80-100 in lbs, so I crept up to 80 (even feels too tight i.e. wrong), and it was dry for several miles of driving, then today while driving had a major tear/split near each bottom bolt
So my covers are still looking fairly flat on the bottom, but have a "bulge" in the middle when tightened down , so I restraighten before reinstalling, but I don't want to overtighten Hopefully I can still use'em, don't really want to see the chrome edlebrocks back on there
My service manual specs say 40 in lbs for stud/nuts, and 9 ft lbs for "valve tappet cover end bolt".....9 ft lbs seems too tight to me ? I think the 40 in lbs for the studs might be better for the bolts also ? Maybe I'm reading the specs (tightening reference at end of engine section) wrong ?
I'm thinking of just using the 40 in lbs on this next (and hopefully last !) attempt
thanks
Same engine and heads (stock iron) sealed fine with cork and previous chrome edlebrock covers 3 yrs ago before I took it apart for body work etc
I swapped back to the original stamped steel covers from car's the orig 383
Holes and flanges didn't seem to be deformed, I gave a little tap or two on the bottom side of holes prior to assembling and painting
I had limited success with orig type felpro cork , lh side sealed well , until I retightened it (for no reason other than I looked at the specs), mistake, then that side leaked also
Black felpro VS50145R has worked well, but only when I ran a continuous smear of black rtv on both sides (the head sealing surface is looking a bit rough), so that took two gaskets to learn that on the rh side
Now I need more, because the lh side where cork failed due to tightening when I shouldn't have, I tried the blue moroso 93055 ?, dry as directed, and they recommend 80-100 in lbs, so I crept up to 80 (even feels too tight i.e. wrong), and it was dry for several miles of driving, then today while driving had a major tear/split near each bottom bolt
So my covers are still looking fairly flat on the bottom, but have a "bulge" in the middle when tightened down , so I restraighten before reinstalling, but I don't want to overtighten Hopefully I can still use'em, don't really want to see the chrome edlebrocks back on there
My service manual specs say 40 in lbs for stud/nuts, and 9 ft lbs for "valve tappet cover end bolt".....9 ft lbs seems too tight to me ? I think the 40 in lbs for the studs might be better for the bolts also ? Maybe I'm reading the specs (tightening reference at end of engine section) wrong ?
I'm thinking of just using the 40 in lbs on this next (and hopefully last !) attempt
thanks