Was a 383-2 and 4 speed available in 67?

[YY1]

I thought it wasn't.

is this tag legit?

 

[Krooser]

Yes...not popular but it was available.

 

[Don Frelier]

From what I've read:
In 1966 they offered the 361 - 2bbl in b-bodies
In 1967 they offered the 383 - 2bbl in b-bodies (and a 4 - barrell as well)

 

[69Coronetrt]

Yes. 61/3 was available in 67.

 

[Don Frelier]

Likely very few still have the original engine with the 2 bbl and the original transmission.

 

[68BabyBlue]

Best friend in high school had an uncle who bought one new. It was a real oddball back in the day, with the stock single exhaust, and full wheel covers.

 

[Darter6]

Yeah ^^^^ My buddy bought new 1971 Challenger 383 2bbl 4 speed.
Didn't stay that way. Insurance was a problem in the late 60's-early 70's
So Chrysler was doing 2bbl 4 speed cars and 340 3 speed cars too to beat the rate increase on performance cars.
True or not I don't know. I just remember when I bought a 340 3 speed Duster in 1970 that is what the insurance agent told me way back then.

 

[69Coronetrt]

Yeah ^^^^ My buddy bought new 1971 Challenger 383 2bbl 4 speed.

I think there may be some misremembering going on....there's no factory documentation that a four speed was available with a 383-2bbl in a 71 Challenger.

https://www.hamtramck-historical.co...DealershipDataBook/1971/71_Challenger0014.jpg

 

[Darter6]

How about a 70 ? 54 years ago was a long time ago...

 

[tonysrt]

318's only came with a 2bbl. and 4 speed was available, so why not a 383 2 bbl.?

 

[YY1]

Four speed was NOT available with a 318 in a B body in 67.

 

[YY1]

I cold have sworn we just had a thread/post about a 67 Dodge, where a very knowledgeable member said 383-2 and four speed wasn't available in 67.

 

[Big bill]

Ask R413 .

 

[RemCharger]

As 69Coronetrt kindly posted, yes.
Here's the #s for 67 Chargers