wsutard
Well-Known Member
Hey engine gurus, I recently purchased a 69 Coronet with a built 340. In diagnosing a bucking/surging issue my mechanic found that all my cylinders were low on the assumed compression. My question is, what could be causing lack of compression for every cylinder?
More detail:
340
Keith Black Pistons
H Beam Rods
Forged Steel Crank
Crowler Cam (285 dur, 480 lift, 110 deg)
Titanium Valves
Hooker Headers
Edelbrock Performance Carb and Intake (1406 Carb, 650 CFM)
Assumed compression for this engine is 10.5 to 1 (155ish PSI) based on the original 340 specs as well as the new internal components.
Right now the compression is reading between 7.5 and 8 to 1 (110-120 PSI).
Another tidbit, the vacuum is supposedly low. Not sure what this means yet as I am learning still.
What could cause this wholesale compression issue?
Here are my guesses based on a conversation with my mechanic:
1. Valve lash. We are going to pull the covers today to check the valve lash. I'm hoping that the valves are not opening all the way and thus not letting a full intake or exhaust. This would be the easiest to fix but I don't see how all 8 sets could be set incorrectly.
2. Mechanic has a theory that the Keith Black pistons are incorrectly assembled. Supposedly these pistons have a specific way in which the piston seals need to be installed and a lot of engine builders mess this up. My mechanic is not advocating looking into this yet as it would be a total tear down.
3. The parts that were advertised as in the engine, are not actually in the engine. While this could be a possibility the original 69 era engine was originally spec'ed at 10.5 to 1. So, even with stock parts the compression should still be in that range.
Any other ideas on what to check? I would like to go into my mechanic with ideas to discuss.
More detail:
340
Keith Black Pistons
H Beam Rods
Forged Steel Crank
Crowler Cam (285 dur, 480 lift, 110 deg)
Titanium Valves
Hooker Headers
Edelbrock Performance Carb and Intake (1406 Carb, 650 CFM)
Assumed compression for this engine is 10.5 to 1 (155ish PSI) based on the original 340 specs as well as the new internal components.
Right now the compression is reading between 7.5 and 8 to 1 (110-120 PSI).
Another tidbit, the vacuum is supposedly low. Not sure what this means yet as I am learning still.
What could cause this wholesale compression issue?
Here are my guesses based on a conversation with my mechanic:
1. Valve lash. We are going to pull the covers today to check the valve lash. I'm hoping that the valves are not opening all the way and thus not letting a full intake or exhaust. This would be the easiest to fix but I don't see how all 8 sets could be set incorrectly.
2. Mechanic has a theory that the Keith Black pistons are incorrectly assembled. Supposedly these pistons have a specific way in which the piston seals need to be installed and a lot of engine builders mess this up. My mechanic is not advocating looking into this yet as it would be a total tear down.
3. The parts that were advertised as in the engine, are not actually in the engine. While this could be a possibility the original 69 era engine was originally spec'ed at 10.5 to 1. So, even with stock parts the compression should still be in that range.
Any other ideas on what to check? I would like to go into my mechanic with ideas to discuss.
Last edited: