Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I've noticed that the reproduction covers for these all have the same stitching pattern, but have a pretty well-defined "tuck and roll" bump between each row of stitches. The rear covers in mine are not split, have the same stitch pattern, but are flat. I feel like a good number of pictures...
A lot of specs across the board went from 1/4 p caster to 3 p caster from the early 70s to late 70s. Probably as a result of radial tires?
But camber generally stayed at about 1/4 p. Probably because the new radial tires stayed relatively skinny?
I've come to the conclusion that fat tires...
Nope, never built one, and sadly...the only small block we stroked was a Ford 351 to 396. That was worth every penny, even though I am not much of a Ford fan.Lol
I have never, regretted stroking a engine as we have a 512, 526 and a 542. More comparable to what your wanting we currently have 2...
Here's an authentic water slide decal on my rear window. It is correct for the era and also the car ran Caslers on its maiden voyages down the track.
My rear quarter windows have only two water slide decals indicating infamous street racing haunts in the NYC area where the car also loitered at...
First off, thanks for the add! My stable consists of a 70 340 4SPD Duster that I restored about 18 years ago and a survivor 68 Coronet 440. This is my first driveable B body, had a 68 RT project car a while back but sold it, and man it drives nice. Planning on getting her out to a few shows...
...data book:
And this is not Plymouth, but a lot of configuration conventions cross-pollinate among "brands" - this is from the ordering guide for Charger:
**edit to add cropped image since this website's scaling function leaves that 2nd image pretty much unreadable:
For what it's worth
M