Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I take that back about 4 doors I Owed a few and nothing wrong with them but years ago my friends would kid me about them. the older I got the more I appreciated them.
Agreed. Problem is, you can't fix stupid, and there are definitely others out there who will think nothing of the nose-in-the-air and positive camber out the wazoo :eek:
-Kurt
yes i drove cars like that new and old because the alignment was not close to factory specs or worn parts. I don't think anyone on this thread or reading this thread would think a car like the way you first got your valiant would be happy with it that way.
Come on, you know what I mean. There absolutely IS a "wrong" way to set up Mopar suspension - enough that it's so skittish that any lapse of concentration will put you in a ditch.
That's the type of alignment that my '69 Valiant had on it when I got it. The seller was "happy" with it that way...
Not sure if Im following this right but my 70 Challenger 4 speed 383 HP had the Holley but not the fresh air package. Wasn’t an RT either, a plain Jane car with flat hood
It's a Ford tool for measuring the spring pressure on points from the 30s
Found this on garage journal
OK...found the V-108 in the 1933 Ford service bulletins. I was surprised to see in the drawing it is indeed used in push mode, unlike the several Snap-on and such versions I have which hook...
you're kidding right ? if my caster is not 5* positive am putting others at risk ? but if I text and talk on the phone, not pay attention, do drugs and drink and speed on a busy road I should be alright as long as my alignment is where you say is good ? or could it be that 4-door cars are less...