- Local time
- 7:41 PM
- Joined
- May 14, 2011
- Messages
- 18,460
- Reaction score
- 36,506
- Location
- On the Ridge, TN
Going back to what is presented to be the OP's original question:
condition", then says one is "driver quality" and the other is in "better condition".
That doesn't make sense...one is not the "same" as the other to begin with, according to his description of each.
I'm trying to understand what the actual question is here.
Is the OP trying to make the argument that original 440 cars shouldn't be thought of in the hobby as "better"
than their 383 cousins?
What's the premise here?
The question is fundamentally flawed - he first states that both of his representative vehicles are in the "sameDown the road, say both maintained to be same condition 20years down the road, is the 440 of driver quality a better car to buy than a better condition 383?
Sam
condition", then says one is "driver quality" and the other is in "better condition".
That doesn't make sense...one is not the "same" as the other to begin with, according to his description of each.
I'm trying to understand what the actual question is here.
Is the OP trying to make the argument that original 440 cars shouldn't be thought of in the hobby as "better"
than their 383 cousins?
What's the premise here?