• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

A photo of a Mustang

I have a 1966 Charger but I have to admit, proportionately Ford did a much better job in the fastback styling department.
 
The wife drove a 69 Mach 1 when we were dating in high school, would love to have kept that. We've both owned several Mustangs through the years, we picked this one up for her a few months back, fantastic car:

1734017507094.jpeg
 
My cousin had a new 67 390 4 gear. Think he got 14.9 in the qtr possibly quicker.
Suspension was not as sturdy as a Mopar. Four people in the car, wide tires meant rear tires rubbing on the inner fender driving on the highway at 60 mph when going over undulations.
Otherwise the car looked very nice. Forest green.
We had a wealthy family in town that owned the county news journal. They had three sons, two where a year apart in age, about my older brothers age and one, a year younger than me. The older two each got identical new black 1967 Mustang GT 390 4 speed S-Code coupes. They drove them till they got 69 road runners, 6 packers. One died in the road runner that flew thru a t- intersection and ended up in a tree. He died and his girlfriend and the other couple in the back seat lived. When the younger one turned 16, he got the older brothers old 67, the one that died. It had been saved and a bored and stroked 390 was now installed in it for him. I rode in it and it was a true screamer. The younger one got a new Trans Am for graduation. They never changed after the death of the one brother and still enjoyed the need for speed. Every car in this story was eventually trashed........... It's always about the money and please forgive me, they were all rich a**holes that never appreciated anything.
 
I have a soft spot for the 64 1/2 cars. I like early and late production cars. I had Mercedes '55 190SL #555 out of a total production of almost 26,000. I had a '63 Savoy that was 180 or so off the line in Newark. About 50 years ago I am set up at a flea market and these 2 guys walk up and pick up a Mustang headlight bezel. How much? $5 OK. Then he shows me the part number inside. C4ZZ. Ford part numbers work: B is 50's, C is 60's D is 70's Etc. The second digit is the year and the third and fourth are the model. So C4ZZ is 1964 Mustang. But there was no '64 Mustang, they were all marketed as '65s. Somewhere along the line the bezels were changed. More part number education: Visiting my Shelby friend the fun part is his parts department. We go down the steps and right at the bottom is an FE dual quad intake! There's a stack of new and used valve covers. On the new box is part number S7MS, S is Shelby, 7 is the year, M is Mustang and S is street! Next time I go I will try to remember pictures!
 
I have a soft spot for the 64 1/2 cars. I like early and late production cars. I had Mercedes '55 190SL #555 out of a total production of almost 26,000. I had a '63 Savoy that was 180 or so off the line in Newark. About 50 years ago I am set up at a flea market and these 2 guys walk up and pick up a Mustang headlight bezel. How much? $5 OK. Then he shows me the part number inside. C4ZZ. Ford part numbers work: B is 50's, C is 60's D is 70's Etc. The second digit is the year and the third and fourth are the model. So C4ZZ is 1964 Mustang. But there was no '64 Mustang, they were all marketed as '65s. Somewhere along the line the bezels were changed. More part number education: Visiting my Shelby friend the fun part is his parts department. We go down the steps and right at the bottom is an FE dual quad intake! There's a stack of new and used valve covers. On the new box is part number S7MS, S is Shelby, 7 is the year, M is Mustang and S is street! Next time I go I will try to remember pictures!
They may have been sold as 1965 Mustangs, but there were a few differences from the April 1964 versions and the actual 1965 models sold later that fall.

The 64.5 cars had a slightly different hood with a sharper front edge, this was why there was a C4 part number on the headlight bezel to match. The '65 hood was rounder and had a different bezel.

Other changes were a slightly different gas cap, several paint colours available on the first 64.5 models only, the first ones had a generator while an alternator came into use for the 1965 models, meaning that the dashboard said "GEN" vs. "ALT" and there were other minor interior trim differences.

Engines were different as well; a guy at work was rebuilding a 1964.5 version (back in 1978) and found it had a 260 engine, the base V8 in 1965 was a 289. The base six was larger in 1965 as well. Only the 271 hp. 289 was shared between the two versions.

The "C4ZZ" numbers weren't part numbers but were engineering numbers, they referred to the year of the design, not the car model year. So if a certain part was used for two model years, it likely retained the original number. Example, C4ZB-13449 was the number for the tail light bezel, but the same design was used from 1964-1966 so the number remained the same.
 
Mustang being towed home.:p

REG-L-MustangMan1841.jpg
 
You're screwed up, and I love it!! :rofl: Wayne, while I'm thinking about it, why is it that I can't use the emojis on the top bar on my phone, but I can on my PC ?

:lol:


Check your inbox about the top bar.
 
They may have been sold as 1965 Mustangs, but there were a few differences from the April 1964 versions and the actual 1965 models sold later that fall.

The 64.5 cars had a slightly different hood with a sharper front edge, this was why there was a C4 part number on the headlight bezel to match. The '65 hood was rounder and had a different bezel.

Other changes were a slightly different gas cap, several paint colours available on the first 64.5 models only, the first ones had a generator while an alternator came into use for the 1965 models, meaning that the dashboard said "GEN" vs. "ALT" and there were other minor interior trim differences.

Engines were different as well; a guy at work was rebuilding a 1964.5 version (back in 1978) and found it had a 260 engine, the base V8 in 1965 was a 289. The base six was larger in 1965 as well. Only the 271 hp. 289 was shared between the two versions.

The "C4ZZ" numbers weren't part numbers but were engineering numbers, they referred to the year of the design, not the car model year. So if a certain part was used for two model years, it likely retained the original number. Example, C4ZB-13449 was the number for the tail light bezel, but the same design was used from 1964-1966 so the number remained the same.
I'm not super well versed, but helped my buddy with several of them. He has a triple black convert v8 3 on the floor he put a 4 Spd in. One thing we found , was earlier cars had a different heater fan motor. 2 speeds built in I believe, with a different switch. Also it had large strut rods under the hood for strength, rarely seen. I do remember something about the hood to. Wish I had a pic, it's a beautiful car. ( for one of those :D )
 
Auto Transport Service
Back
Top