Gentlemen: Thanks for all the recent replies. I'll respond to those shortly, but I have a set of driveline angles that I feel much more confident in. Please feel free to double check my math and logic!
Car setup
I set the car up in my garage with rear axle on jack stands so the leaf springs were holding the weight of the car. The front frame was on jack stands (just behind front wheels on each side), so front wheels were hanging in the air. Only non-ideal element here was that the back of the car was maybe an inch two higher than when it is actually sitting on the ground. All measurements were taken multiple times to ensure I got consistent results.
I measured off the frame just behind the front wheel and the
car was sitting 0.1* high in the back.
Engine/ Transmission
I then measured the engine/ transmission. I found a really nice spot right on the yoke of the driveshaft that is machined and flat. I measured it to be 1.9* down (i.e. engine up higher than the transmission). So I'll call it 1.9* down 'absolute'. When I add in the error due to the frame being out of center, the
engine/ transmission is 2.0* down relative to the frame. I verified this measurement using the front pulley and it was very close (2.0* down 'absolute', so within 0.1*).
Driveshaft
Measured the driveshaft directly by attaching the magnetic tool on the front part of the driveshaft. It measured 4.9* down 'absolute'. So
driveshaft is 5.0* down relative to the frame.
Rear Differential
I took off the driveshaft off and measured the yoke itself by putting a flat piece of 1/4 " plate steel against the front of it and the tool attached to the plate steel. The yoke is pointing up (i.e. the part that attaches to the driveshaft is pointing up in the air) by 1.3* 'absolute'. So the
yoke is 1.4* up relative to the frame
So the driveline 'rules' as I understand them:
- Engine/ transmission should point down 0.5* to 3.0*. My actual is 2.0* down. So this is OK.
- The rear differential should be very close to parallel with the engine and transmission. If it is not it will cause the harmonic as shown in the video posted by @1 Wild R/T. The difference between my two is 0.6*. There was another video I saw that said it really needs to be less than 1.0*. Mine is not ideal, but is probably OK?
- U joints angles must be at least at 0.5* but should be less than 3.0* to avoid excessive wear. My front U-joint is at 3.0* and my rear is at 3.6*. Reducing these angles would have to be done my having my rear wheels sit up in the wheel wells more (back of the car more squat). The Hemi leaf springs sit the up a little bit (give it some rake), but I am not ready to call these values bad. I will suggest these values are marginal but probably OK?.
So the bottom line of my driveline measurements indicates that while they may not be "prefect", I'm not sure I would call any of these a smoking gun and say they are the problem.
What do you guys think about the measurements - any comments?
Edit: My second bullet is the setup for a passenger car without leaf springs. As a leaf spring goes under load it arches the front of the pinion up. So at rest, it should be further down than being parallel to the line of the engine/ transmission. But by how much???
The image shared by
@1 Wild R/T shows the engine/trans should be 3 degrees down, and the rear should also be down by 3 degrees. My engine is down by 2 degrees. So should I set up my rear to be down by 4 degrees? Wow. I already have 2 degree shims shimming it down....