Steve009
Well-Known Member
Don"t forget the old tm6. Will you be running a hood scoop? The tm6 and the torker are about the only two that will fit under a stock hood.
I have hemi scoop on mine so clearance isn't an issue
Don"t forget the old tm6. Will you be running a hood scoop? The tm6 and the torker are about the only two that will fit under a stock hood.
You are correct, the Torker is an outdated design. The Edelbrock Victor intake is better than the Torker for making power but the Trick Flow intake is even better than the Victor. No reason to run the old designs unless you're flat broke and have to use a swap meet intake.
If you are shooting for 600 hp with the 240 heads then you'll want to run the batwing gasket holders to get the port alignment perfect. The standard tin pan gasket won't have the port locations perfectly correct for the 240 heads which will cost you some power.
View attachment 555724
This was a comparison on my 440 9.9 comp, 240 TF solid roller 238/242@50 .620 lift 112lsa
RPM..................Victor TQ/HP..................RPM TQ/HP
3000...................472/269.......................495/283.....+23/+14
3100...................468/276.......................500/295.....+32/+19
3200...................483/294.......................515/314.....+32/+20
3300...................500/314.......................541/340.....+41/+36
3400...................513/332.......................546/354.....+33/+22
3500...................514/342.......................547/364.....+33/+22
3600...................516/354.......................550/377.....+34/+23
3700...................510/359.......................552/389.....+42/+30
3800...................516/373.......................555/401.....+39/+28
3900...................520/386.......................555/412.....+35/+26
4000...................528/402.......................558/425.....+30/+23
4100...................529/413.......................553/431.....+24/+18
4200...................532/425.......................553/442.....+21/+17
4300...................539/441.......................548/449.......+9/+8
4400...................545/456.......................552/462.......+7/+6
4500...................550/471.......................554/475.......+4/+4
4600...................554/485.......................553/484........-1/-1
4700...................552/494.......................550/492........-2/-2
4800...................562/513.......................558/510........-4/-3
4900...................560/522.......................556/518........-4/-4
5000...................562/535.......................552/526.......-10/-9
5100...................561/545.......................558/542........-3/-3
5200...................551/546.......................556/550........-5/-4
5300...................554/559.......................548/553........-6/-6
5400...................546/561.......................546/561.........0/0
5500...................549/575.......................544/570........-5/-5
5600...................541/576.......................532/568........-9/-8
5700...................539/585.......................530/575........-9/-10
5800...................534/590.......................517/571......-17/-19
5900...................526/591.......................508/570......-18/-21
6000...................512/584.......................497/568......-15/-16
6100...................503/585.......................480/558......-23/-27
unless your building a high reving engine go with the dual plane.
What cam are you going to run? Is this a street/strip strip or street only car? If you go to my build "trick flows on the 440"you can find some flow # comparison if you'd like. I went with the 6bbl, you'd be surprised at the results.
What gaskets are you using on your batwings? Fel pro or Hughes with the silicone seal?You are correct, the Torker is an outdated design. The Edelbrock Victor intake is better than the Torker for making power but the Trick Flow intake is even better than the Victor. No reason to run the old designs unless you're flat broke and have to use a swap meet intake.
If you are shooting for 600 hp with the 240 heads then you'll want to run the batwing gasket holders to get the port alignment perfect. The standard tin pan gasket won't have the port locations perfectly correct for the 240 heads which will cost you some power.
View attachment 555724
If buying new go with the trickflow. The dualplane will Work but it won’t have nearly as good distribution as a single plane on the big motor.
I’ve played with both on my 511. Six pack (dual plane) and a TM6. The TM6 has great distribution and doesn’t really give up anything to the dual plane on the 511. Ultimately though I run the six pack for the look. Both setups ET the same.
View attachment 585916
beautiful engine. really both setups are the same ET? that surprises me but cool to know.
I made 651hp 707tq with a performer RPM on a 400/512 on pump gas.I always had the impression that the Torker was an old outdated design but that’s good to know. I’ll run it by my engine builder. I was hoping to use my eddy perf rpm but the he says 600hp would be hard with a dual plane so now I’m shopping around.
Easy to make 600+ on a stroker with the RPM dual plane.I always had the impression that the Torker was an old outdated design but that’s good to know. I’ll run it by my engine builder. I was hoping to use my eddy perf rpm but the he says 600hp would be hard with a dual plane so now I’m shopping around.
You would t want to share the combo of parts now would ya?Easy to make 600+ on a stroker with the RPM dual plane.
Easy to make 600+ on a stroker with the RPM dual plane.