66Satellite47
Well-Known Member
The cam lobe design makes more difference than the rocker ratio. Remember the piston to valve issue is not at max lobe lift. You do want some extra clearance to play with to move the cam timing around a bit.
Interesting you brought that up because that was another point I've been researching. So, I called the folks over at TrickFlow and they said it's as casy, but they're engineering team is send over the valve drop measurements to double check. Nice catch!I didn't check the math, but it seems right. It does make an assumption that the valve starts at the same height in the chamber.
Need to know how much the valve opens till it is at the head deck surface. The closed valve distance above the deck can be different for many reasons, like the head was milled, or the valve seats were cut deeper, or the new head has a different chamber design, ....
I measure mine the same way, but I find the exhaust is closest 10° btdc, and the intake 5-15° atdc. Not worried about the radial, the reliefs are plenty large enough in diameter.I measured mine with a indicator on the valve stem, a light checking spring, and the piston at TDC.
That will seldom give an accurate reading. I was lazy one day and used that method. Next day walked the both the intake and exhaust up over the lobe checking at 5* increments. The results were very different, nearly .050. It does depend on the lope design, but surely the proper method is needed.I measured mine with a indicator on the valve stem, a light checking spring, and the piston at TDC.