RustyRatRod
Well-Known Member
OK RustyRatRod...
"the cats outta the bag....!"
Hey:
PM me, tell me the details, I wont tell anyone..:angel11:
LOL
Just sayin.
OK RustyRatRod...
"the cats outta the bag....!"
Hey:
PM me, tell me the details, I wont tell anyone..:angel11:
LOL
Did all the cars have this in 1970 or is this the CAP stuff only? My car was sold in Hemet, which is 100 miles east of Los Angeles and in 1970 (even today) was decidedly NOT a major metro area.
If a car were a CAP car, shouldn't there be SOMETHING on the VIN plate indicating this? I mean they indicated the type of rear view mirror!
1970 Roadrunner RM21N0E - Los Angeles plant 383HP 4BBL
Ok gents. My car HAS the listed items: Charcoal canister, dual snorkel air cleaner, vacuum operated carb heat plates on/in the snorkel, vent pipes in the trunk to capture fuel tank vapors and route them into the intake, etc.
Did all the cars have this in 1970 or is this the CAP stuff only? My car was sold in Hemet, which is 100 miles east of Los Angeles and in 1970 (even today) was decidedly NOT a major metro area.
If a car were a CAP car, shouldn't there be SOMETHING on the VIN plate indicating this? I mean they indicated the type of rear view mirror!
No the VIN didnt' tell, other than assembly plant, but I don't think that "tells" as the assembly plant undoubtedly made non CAP cars for out of state
Fender tag/ build sheet, maybe
You HAVE a CAP car. Mine, when I owned it a year old was NOT a cap car and had NONE of the extra tanks/ tubing in the trunk. If you re--read my post, you'll see I argued with a cop over that in one of their famous roadside checks.
I don't think CA fiddled with rural versus city cars. I think if CA wanted "stuff" installed in CA, it was statewide. My recollection, at least.
I'll never go back, ever. For any reason. Oregon is close on the list.
It was not "State wide" initially in 1970.
That is why I started this thread. It was Los Angeles county that first initiated this and Chrysler "folded" and produced the first CAP car for the Los Angeles area.
OK. Help me out with the next step here.
Perfectly willing to accept that I have a CAP car - built in Los Angeles with an October 1969 date coded engine and delivered to Plymouth of Hemet in San Bernardino County, and with the hoses and tubes and canister.
But my car now has a Holley carb, the vacuum hoses for all that stuff have long since rotted away and I don't think the vents in the tank hurt anything. So the effect of those items on the performance of the engine, to the extent that they really harmed performance anyway, is none.
AND THE CAR IS STILL SLOW - I mean I don't think it makes anything like 335hp. It has 50,00 original miles, and I'll be the first to admit that I have no idea what would have happened to the engine in that time (before I got it), so it may be damaged, but runs perfectly. What I do know is that it shows about 120psi max compression in each of the cylinders. Divide by 14.7 and you get 8.2 to 1 compression Now that's LOW!
Did the CAP cars have lower compression, milder cam, other really sinister mods that ACTUALLY affect horsepower?