Getting a traffic ticket automatically dismissed because of a minor clerical error is a myth that's been around forever. If the completely wrong vehicle or license plate was on the ticket you might have a good chance of dismissal.
Well, I beg to differ on this. Transposing the date to much earlier is not a simple clerical error, and if he goes in and states that he was somewhere else during the time the ticket was issued, and can back it up, they will have no other choice than to dismiss it. They can’t change information on the ticket, not at the court, or by the cop who wrote it, it would be considered tampering with what would be evidence to one side or the other. The other choice the magistrate could make is to push it to a judge and set a court date, which of course I would attend, because I like the challenge. A lot of things can happen here, and if the fine and points are steep enough, hell yea you fight it.
Remember here that the plaintiff (the cop) has the burden of proof that the incident happened as stated on the citation given at the time of the infraction, and the defendant (our hero) is answering to the charges as alleged on the citation received. Although he may have done everything said on the ticket, he did not do it on the alleged day, and he just has to prove that the citation is not correct, because in fact it is not. He wasn’t there and didn’t do what the ticket states on the day the ticket states that it was, as the citation charges that it happened. The case will have to be dismissed, based on the misinformation written on the citation as received. Will they take it further than the magistrate just dismissing it? I doubt it
I’ve done it many times, all when I was in the right, and all but one was dismissed. That one was over no turn signals on a trailer that wasn’t mine, and despite the orange triangle and my hand signals, which weren’t good enough for the judge because “not everybody knows hand signals”. I could’ve argued further, but I just pod the fine and left.