I think he should be in prison,
he's a dirtbag, he's a liar, he's an embezzler, a con man too possibly
he should be tried on that in a different case & court
(
this is like OJ getting off because he was black & a cop used the N word
& this douchebag was convicted of murder because he was a wealthy White guy
that was a dirtbag, this has all the earmarks of a race trial, just like OJ's,
**** that had absolutely nothing to do with him murdering 2 people)
but;
they didn't prove he killed his wife & son
not beyond a reasonable amount of doubt...
they even had to dismiss a juror for talking to people outside the jury
did he murder them, maybe (? probably)
but they didn't prove it at all... NO
just because a jury doesn't like you
&
you're a RICH prominent & White douchebag/dirtbag Lawyer
they don't like you, because of, them facts, it doesn't equate to murder guilt
the judge is/was bias also, you could tell during sentencing
all the evidence they brought in/forward,
is circumstantial at best
& him being a drug addict, and a habitual liar
(poss. because of the drugs & paranoia)
&/or an embezzler, cheater/total
douchebag/
dirtbag for personal financial gains
ripping off his clients & firm, THAT ALL has nothing to do with
their murders
it's called due process, unbias,
everyone 'even dirtbags/rich white douchebags',
is entitled to a fair trial of
the truth, the fact, the evidence & nothing but the truth/facts
so help them, GOD
that other crap/****, should have been a separate trial altogether
that ****
he is completely guilty of,
he admitted it on the witness stand in court, under oath
under penalty of law
again that doesn't equate
to murder guilt,
no matter how much you dislike the
douchebag/
dirtbag
I hate to say it but the LEOs blew the case
no gun, no ballistics evidence
they didn't do the phone research, NAV or GPS **** or otherwise
on the wife & his kids' cell phones (threats against his sons)
until after 5 days
all the info was not available after that
they never had
any other person of interest, no other suspects
at all
when there was enough cause to at least look into it
only the defendant, was a suspect
(
I know most of the time it's someone related or close to or know by the victims,
that's the guilty or a perp...
but; they should do their jobs & investigate,
especially without the bloody spattered clothes & smoking gun)
there was so much outside BS that had/has nothing to do with murder/s
again IMHFO he belongs in prison
they did not prove he committed murder, not beyond a reasonable doubt
no matter how much he lied, or was a total dirtbag
I don't know if any of you people, ever served on a real case in/on a real jury
that is the 1st thing the judge tells you
or should
don't take into account anything that doesn't pertain to the actual case
way too many holes in the case, & yes
he wasn't likable & they convicted him on his other crimes,
but for murder
not for the
fact/proof he did these murders
the murder charges
never were forensically proven
&
no smoking gun or
murder weapon/s
or
no blood-spattered clothing/shoes etc.
not in his house or his bedroom or his/mothers or parents' house
jsut a small drop/lil' of his blood (a spot) in his car,
or even the clothes he was wearing, to commit the crime
they didn't have any of it
being a dirtbag & a con artist doesn't mean
'you killed your wife & son'
beyond a reasonable doubt
'if it doesn't fit you must acquit'
him being a liar
& a despicable human,
that isn't proof of guilt, of murdering his wife & son
IMHFO the jury had made up their minds before the trial was even over
it will be appealed (defense atty. said supposedly in 10 days)
& I'll bet, he will get a new trial, based on what I pointed out
so much ****, that was done wrong & the judge is part of that too...
I suppose if I was on that jury, it'd been a hung jury
no way I would convict him (not of murder) on the evidence put forward
by what they presented as "murder 1" x 2 counts of charges
(he may have done it, but that's not the point, there's no tangible evidence
no smoking gun or the actual murder weapon, clothing or otherwise
showing that he was guilty, not 'beyond a/any reasonable doubt' )
Again I think he should be in prison
for the other crimes, but they jumped the gun
(didn't even find one) on Murder
to each their own
View attachment 1427551
