- Local time
- 10:56 AM
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2010
- Messages
- 31,169
- Reaction score
- 55,904
- Location
- Hanover, Pennslyvania
I like this guy.
My wife's 2016 Jeep Cherokee sends an alarm and stops on it's own if an object is too close to it when backing up! You mean to tell me the Jeep has better technology than Helicopters and Commercial Jet Planes?Their altitude was below 400 ft and I don't think TCAS alerts below 1000 ft otherwise it may tell you to descend which would put you in the water/terrain.
Better brakes maybe?My wife's 2016 Jeep Cherokee sends an alarm and stops on it's own if an object is too close to it when backing up! You mean to tell me the Jeep has better technology than Helicopters and Commercial Jet Planes?
Your jeep doesn't have near the closing speed of a Blackhawk helicopter. And 1 or 2 seconds is 1 or 2 seconds, even if proximity alerts did go off.My wife's 2016 Jeep Cherokee sends an alarm and stops on it's own if an object is too close to it when backing up! You mean to tell me the Jeep has better technology than Helicopters and Commercial Jet Planes?
his screen should have had their elevation on it too, that's his job ....Post #18 has the video of the TC in communications with the helicopter. He tells him to pass behind the plane. He could see both aircraft on the screen.
that's why the atc should have told him to change his altitude immediately !!New speculation came up during a presser today, that the military crew may have been using night vision. Another potential malfunction layer...
once again the atc should have been watching and told him to change altitude immediately , its his only job to watch and advise in and outgoing flites...Your jeep doesn't have near the closing speed of a Blackhawk helicopter. And 1 or 2 seconds is 1 or 2 seconds, even if proximity alerts did go off.
But when one ATC is doing the job of two - normally one ATC for helicopters and one for jets - balls get dropped.once again the atc should have been watching and told him to change altitude immediately , its his only job to watch and advise in and outgoing flites...
An extra set of eyes is always a good thing in aviation. However, if the 3rd crewmember is a Flight Mechanic/Engineer, the Engineer is also very busy monitoring gauges and indications related to the mechanics of the aircraft and that it is functioning properly so watching out for traffic can be difficult at times. My personal take on choppers is I do not like nor feel safe in a rotary-winged aircraft. They are usually VFR aircraft that fly at lower altitudes than fixed-winged aircraft so they are not as fully equipped as their big brothers are with instrumentation and TCAS equipment. As more has been coming to light on this, the ATC issue is now turning into the front of it all as to its involvement in causing this crash. Like 2 missed approaches and go-arounds/aborts, in a matter of days last week. Not a good track record at all... cr8crhr/BillCurious, would the third person on the helicopter have any responsibility or played any part in this accident?
So the Black Hawk may have no TCAS but can "see" the other planes in the vicinity? Why would they even allow a helo to EVER directly cross an active approach slope, that just seems making this accident inevitable and just a matter of time before it happened?I've installed TCAS on planes.
I would be surprised if fighting military aircraft have TCAS .
So I checked the Internet.
Commercial Civilian aircraft also have winshear warning systems for landing
Most military helicopters — like the Black Hawk that collided with the aircraft — aren't equipped with TCAS but have transponders that can interact with planes. Here's what we know about the technology and why it might not have preven Wednesday's collision.
Apparently there's a 200 foot ceiling for helicopters in the area that was violated (collision was around 400 if I recall...)So the Black Hawk may have no TCAS but can "see" the other planes in the vicinity? Why would they even allow a helo to EVER directly cross an active approach slope, that just seems making this accident inevitable and just a matter of time before it happened?
An extra set of eyes is always a good thing in aviation. However, if the 3rd crewmember is a Flight Mechanic/Engineer, the Engineer is also very busy monitoring gauges and indications related to the mechanics of the aircraft and that it is functioning properly so watching out for traffic can be difficult at times.