• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

FOR SALE New OE Turn Signal Switches '62-'63 and '64-'69 (They're baa-aaack!)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Slantsixdan

FBBO Gold Member
FBBO Gold Member
Local time
1:19 AM
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
360
Reaction score
293
Location
Canada
Feedback: +2 / =0 / -0
Contact seller
Brand new OE turn signal switches are on my shelf.

These are newly made according to the final-revision Chrysler blueprint, by an original supplier to Chrysler. These are not the crude, poor-quality Chinese knockoffs available all over the place, and they are not the Shee-Mar parts that kindasorta fit and fail early and often; they are the real deal – they fit and work all the way correctly, and they have the correct snap/click switch operational feel.

Two types are available (click any pic for larger):

• With split-flat-spade Packard terminals for '62-'63 cars
(part № 2258 700)

Turn_Switch_2258-700_2989_Recto_s.jpg


Turn_Switch_2258-700_2987_Verso_s.jpg


• With "Twin-Lock" box-and-point terminals for '64-'69 cars
(part №s 2631 383, 2496 163, 2822 170, 2857 241)

Turn_Switch_2631-383_2993_Recto_s.jpg


Turn_Switch_2631-383_2995_Verso_s.jpg


Applications are A-bodies, B-bodies, and C-bodies, and (some) Imperials without tilt steering column.

A loose and sloppy, worn-out old switch is a pain (no click-snap into position, no self-cancelling, wondering if both your brake lights will work today…). Spend endless money-time-effort on repeatedly-failing poor-quality ones, spend a mountain of money on a new old stock switch…or buy one of these new-new-stock switches off me for $129.82 + $13.18 postage (for up to 3 switches) within the lower 48 states = $143.00, USD.

Shipping (from Michigan) by Priority Mail, within the US, usually takes about a week. Postage to other locations on request. Please send me a PM.

About that horn contact:

These switches have the solid-copper brush type of horn contact, rather than the roller wheel. This might make you squawk, and it's understandable why: a lot of the crummy-quality switches have a poorly-made version of the solid brush, and because that's a visible difference to the old-production OE switches, it came to be associated with the crummy ones, and people came to look out for the solid brush as an indicator (zing!) of a switch to avoid. Also, it's not common knowledge that when installing a switch with the solid brush, you apply appropriate lubricant to the contact ring on the back of the steering wheel so there won't be any noise made as the brush slides on the contact ring, so people would install them dry, and then when they heard noise from it, they'd decide that meant the solid brush contact is no good.

There's nothing wrong with the brush-type horn contact, if it's made well and installed properly. Chrysler themselves phased out the roller wheel and went to the solid brush in the early-mid '70s on all OE turn signal switches, and Mopar replacement switches came with a sheet advising the installer to apply a thin film of lube to the contact ring:

70-up-turn-switch-horn-contact-lube-notification_s.jpg


For awhile, the Mopar switches came with a little capsule of appropriate lube, a graphite grease. I don't have any such capsules, but graphite grease is easy to buy, or you can make some by mixing regular graphite powder into regular white lithium grease. Or dry graphite-film spray would do the job. Or heck, if I had none of the above and needed to install a switch in a hurry, I'd grab a regular № 2 pencil and apply it all over the contact ring, then assemble it and drive off. The need here is just for something slippery and conductive.

The Chrysler blueprint for these '62-'69 switches has provisions for either type of setup, roller wheel or solid brush, and the horn brush assembly in my switches is really nicely made: appropriate diameter slug of good copper, chamfered so it won't chatter; good, lively fully-enclosed spring, precise fit of the brush within its sleeve so it won't bind, etc.

And after all that, if you still have doubts about it, I guess there are two good answers:

• There are brushes and not roller wheels in your alternator, starter, blower motor, and wiper motor.
• These are still the best switches on the planet for this application.
redbeard.gif
 
Sounds like you have a well made product. Any plans on making a 70 model switch? That is a much needed part.
That is a real toughie for several reasons. At the moment odds look kinda steep against it, but I won't say it's impossible. If I had an original '70 switch or two, to examine closely, that'd help. Guess I'll put up a want ad about it.
 
Well, I think it would pay you to make them for one simple reason. There are plenty of very expensive cars built in 70 that use that switch. And there are plenty of other 70 models built. I assume that it is the flasher button that complicates things. I could send you one to examine if I could get it back when you’re done. I think they changed 71 or 72. It may be a one year only. The later ones have a different size flasher button and it pushes or pulls different. I can look at my stash and see. You might be able to just offer a repair service because it you can build new ones, you should be able to repair them. The one big difference is the wires are made flat so they will go through the column and the connector is already in place. Let me know.
Mark
 
Yup, a '71+ switch would fit and work fine in a '70 if it weren't for the flasher differences. For that reason, the '70 switches are one-year-only.
 
Do you know what's the difference between these and what goes in a Tilt Column? Specifically 64-65 b body? I have a Satellite that I want to put a 64 Chrysler tilt column into, and was wondering if I could make this switch harness work.
 
Brand new OE turn signal switches are on my shelf.

These are newly made according to the final-revision Chrysler blueprint, by an original supplier to Chrysler. These are not the crude, poor-quality Chinese knockoffs available all over the place, and they are not the Shee-Mar parts that kindasorta fit and fail early and often; they are the real deal – they fit and work all the way correctly, and they have the correct snap/click switch operational feel.

Two types are available (click any pic for larger):

• With split-flat-spade Packard terminals for '62-'63 cars
(part № 2258 700)

View attachment 1982344

View attachment 1982345

• With "Twin-Lock" box-and-point terminals for '64-'69 cars
(part №s 2631 383, 2496 163, 2822 170, 2857 241)

View attachment 1982346

View attachment 1982347

Applications are A-bodies, B-bodies, and C-bodies, and (some) Imperials without tilt steering column.

A loose and sloppy, worn-out old switch is a pain (no click-snap into position, no self-cancelling, wondering if both your brake lights will work today…). Spend endless money-time-effort on repeatedly-failing poor-quality ones, spend a mountain of money on a new old stock switch…or buy one of these new-new-stock switches off me for $129.82 + $13.18 postage (for up to 3 switches) within the lower 48 states = $143.00, USD.

Shipping (from Michigan) by Priority Mail, within the US, usually takes about a week. Postage to other locations on request. Please send me a PM.

About that horn contact:

These switches have the solid-copper brush type of horn contact, rather than the roller wheel. This might make you squawk, and it's understandable why: a lot of the crummy-quality switches have a poorly-made version of the solid brush, and because that's a visible difference to the old-production OE switches, it came to be associated with the crummy ones, and people came to look out for the solid brush as an indicator (zing!) of a switch to avoid. Also, it's not common knowledge that when installing a switch with the solid brush, you apply appropriate lubricant to the contact ring on the back of the steering wheel so there won't be any noise made as the brush slides on the contact ring, so people would install them dry, and then when they heard noise from it, they'd decide that meant the solid brush contact is no good.

There's nothing wrong with the brush-type horn contact, if it's made well and installed properly. Chrysler themselves phased out the roller wheel and went to the solid brush in the early-mid '70s on all OE turn signal switches, and Mopar replacement switches came with a sheet advising the installer to apply a thin film of lube to the contact ring:

View attachment 1982348

For awhile, the Mopar switches came with a little capsule of appropriate lube, a graphite grease. I don't have any such capsules, but graphite grease is easy to buy, or you can make some by mixing regular graphite powder into regular white lithium grease. Or dry graphite-film spray would do the job. Or heck, if I had none of the above and needed to install a switch in a hurry, I'd grab a regular № 2 pencil and apply it all over the contact ring, then assemble it and drive off. The need here is just for something slippery and conductive.

The Chrysler blueprint for these '62-'69 switches has provisions for either type of setup, roller wheel or solid brush, and the horn brush assembly in my switches is really nicely made: appropriate diameter slug of good copper, chamfered so it won't chatter; good, lively fully-enclosed spring, precise fit of the brush within its sleeve so it won't bind, etc.

And after all that, if you still have doubts about it, I guess there are two good answers:

• There are brushes and not roller wheels in your alternator, starter, blower motor, and wiper motor.
• These are still the best switches on the planet for this application.
View attachment 1982349
Great job! Looks like a quality product! Congratulations and thank you for
Your efforts! Best of luck in your sales. Buying one as a show of support!
 
Brand new OE turn signal switches are on my shelf.

These are newly made according to the final-revision Chrysler blueprint, by an original supplier to Chrysler. These are not the crude, poor-quality Chinese knockoffs available all over the place, and they are not the Shee-Mar parts that kindasorta fit and fail early and often; they are the real deal – they fit and work all the way correctly, and they have the correct snap/click switch operational feel.

Two types are available (click any pic for larger):

• With split-flat-spade Packard terminals for '62-'63 cars
(part № 2258 700)

View attachment 1982344

View attachment 1982345

• With "Twin-Lock" box-and-point terminals for '64-'69 cars
(part №s 2631 383, 2496 163, 2822 170, 2857 241)

View attachment 1982346

View attachment 1982347

Applications are A-bodies, B-bodies, and C-bodies, and (some) Imperials without tilt steering column.

A loose and sloppy, worn-out old switch is a pain (no click-snap into position, no self-cancelling, wondering if both your brake lights will work today…). Spend endless money-time-effort on repeatedly-failing poor-quality ones, spend a mountain of money on a new old stock switch…or buy one of these new-new-stock switches off me for $129.82 + $13.18 postage (for up to 3 switches) within the lower 48 states = $143.00, USD.

Shipping (from Michigan) by Priority Mail, within the US, usually takes about a week. Postage to other locations on request. Please send me a PM.

About that horn contact:

These switches have the solid-copper brush type of horn contact, rather than the roller wheel. This might make you squawk, and it's understandable why: a lot of the crummy-quality switches have a poorly-made version of the solid brush, and because that's a visible difference to the old-production OE switches, it came to be associated with the crummy ones, and people came to look out for the solid brush as an indicator (zing!) of a switch to avoid. Also, it's not common knowledge that when installing a switch with the solid brush, you apply appropriate lubricant to the contact ring on the back of the steering wheel so there won't be any noise made as the brush slides on the contact ring, so people would install them dry, and then when they heard noise from it, they'd decide that meant the solid brush contact is no good.

There's nothing wrong with the brush-type horn contact, if it's made well and installed properly. Chrysler themselves phased out the roller wheel and went to the solid brush in the early-mid '70s on all OE turn signal switches, and Mopar replacement switches came with a sheet advising the installer to apply a thin film of lube to the contact ring:

View attachment 1982348

For awhile, the Mopar switches came with a little capsule of appropriate lube, a graphite grease. I don't have any such capsules, but graphite grease is easy to buy, or you can make some by mixing regular graphite powder into regular white lithium grease. Or dry graphite-film spray would do the job. Or heck, if I had none of the above and needed to install a switch in a hurry, I'd grab a regular № 2 pencil and apply it all over the contact ring, then assemble it and drive off. The need here is just for something slippery and conductive.

The Chrysler blueprint for these '62-'69 switches has provisions for either type of setup, roller wheel or solid brush, and the horn brush assembly in my switches is really nicely made: appropriate diameter slug of good copper, chamfered so it won't chatter; good, lively fully-enclosed spring, precise fit of the brush within its sleeve so it won't bind, etc.

And after all that, if you still have doubts about it, I guess there are two good answers:

• There are brushes and not roller wheels in your alternator, starter, blower motor, and wiper motor.
• These are still the best switches on the planet for this application.
View attachment 1982349
Do you happen to have a good video or two showing the installation? My signal return does not work and I need to decide if I want to tackle this on my 67 Belvedere.
 
Well, I think it would pay you to make them for one simple reason. There are plenty of very expensive cars built in 70 that use that switch. And there are plenty of other 70 models built
I think that the 70 E body crowd, of which I'm a member, would also be very interested in a well built switch. I'll be following.... :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top