33 IMP
Well-Known Member
- Local time
- 5:43 AM
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2017
- Messages
- 12,935
- Reaction score
- 21,178
- Location
- taxifornia,soon 2b Arizona.
Risk, or unreasonable risk, has to be assessed
Ten miles over speedlimit, wearing a seat belt, verses 100 mph not wearing a belt. (We've all seen the latter).
Lane splitting at ten miles over traffic speed, with a helmet, verses lane splitting at 50mph faster than traffic, without a helmet. (I've seen the latter)
Crossing a busy street with a walk sign, verses running across a freeway.
Insurance should cover everyday risks we all take. Not unreasonable risk.
Ten miles over speedlimit, wearing a seat belt, verses 100 mph not wearing a belt. (We've all seen the latter).
Lane splitting at ten miles over traffic speed, with a helmet, verses lane splitting at 50mph faster than traffic, without a helmet. (I've seen the latter)
Crossing a busy street with a walk sign, verses running across a freeway.
Insurance should cover everyday risks we all take. Not unreasonable risk.