Last edited:
I'm pretty sure that Ronnie made a living stirring a Hurst. That Inland would be one of the first things to go.Seems to me that Sox and Martin did extremely well with an Inland. If it was good enough for them, I guess I will use ours. I will keep the Hurst shifter that was in the car when we bought it.
Rebuttal! He was earning a living with the Inland as well, as far as I can ascertain. He was JUST a winner.I'm pretty sure that Ronnie made a living stirring a Hurst. That Inland would be one of the first things to go.
You can tell an inland car from a Hurst car by whether there's a reverse indicator or notDid early '68's still have Inlands?
Apparently there's an adapter for this these days:"Inland" was the supplier of 4-speed shifter mechanisms to Chrysler from 1966-early1968. Characterized by tubular shifter with T-handle to access Reverse. Black knob with shift pattern. They must have been cheaper than a Hurst, and did not work as well. I built a 1967 Coronet with a 4-speed, and adapted an Inland shifter handle to a set of Hurst guts, to make it look correct for the year of production. I am not good at grabbing pictures and posting them, so will leave this to someone else.
I believe they ran out until they tool up to make moreApparently there's an adapter for this these days:
SHIFTER MECHANISM HURST/INLAND CONVERSION - Mopar A833 4-Speed Transmission & Component Specialists
So it would appear. Makes me think "imported".I believe they ran out until they tool up to make more