Steve009
Well-Known Member
Don't do it, you'll regret it for a street car. Trust me!
you think a 3.91 will be that bad for higher end speeds? Ill be screaming at 60mph?
Don't do it, you'll regret it for a street car. Trust me!
Easy question first. I like and use both Holley and Edelbrock, just not brand loyal to either one. I've had a few issues with both, but more good than bad. The carb was just an example of the bad, but I don't think it was because it was and Edelbrock, it just didn't work for my application. I don't buy one brand of parts and try not to buy just for any name.
I've been told that aluminum heads get worse gas mileage that stock, but have no proof of that. Interesting to see if someone does. Edelbrock said the 600 CFM was good enough up to a 400. I did not check with Holley, so thanks for that information. Did you know which one, since as far as I know all the classic and avenger carbs are vacuum secondaries. Also, I should mention it was an Edelbrock 1406 mechanical secondaries carb, which they clearly state is calibrated for fuel economy. The 1405 I beleive is calibrated for performance. My car stumbled at stop signs/stop lights and really stumbled under harder acceleration. Tuning the carb, I mostly got the stumble out from the stop by making it pig rich. No matter what, I could not get the hard acceleration stumble out. I just happen to have the Holley 750 4160 sitting in the garage so I slapped that on there and it performed far better. My feeling is that it's mostly from the 750 CFM rather than the vacuum secondaries. If I had a Edelbrock 1411 to compare, I could probably give you a better answer on that.
After 20 minutes at that speed you'll hate yourself for doing it. You won't want to take it on the highway for any length of time after you first outing.you think a 3.91 will be that bad for higher end speeds? Ill be screaming at 60mph?
I agree with 727, 750cfm vac secondary,dual plane intake, and 323 gears,to much open road around Ottawa to enjoy to run 391s,but,they are fun!