8 3/4 question

[Cranky]

i don't buy it. There is no way Chrysler built a wider housing for 1964 only. Look at the numbers. 62-65 cars are physically the same. It shows a 64 housing 2 3/8" wider than a 63. Thats BS. And then they narrowed it in 65. No way. Look at most charts. They are specing the track widths the same from 62-70. How did they accomplish that without having numerous different axle offsets, different backing plates? Nope.
Doug

'track widths' might be the same but axle housing widths are not the same......the difference isn't much but it's different. 68-70 is pretty much the same but I know the 67-66 is a bit different. Not much but might be enough to make a difference to matter with some wheels......

 

[matthon]

67 complete assembly is 1 3/8 narrower than a 64 and my 275's are now very happy

You think this would work on a 64 Wagon?

 

[dadsbee]

You think this would work on a 64 Wagon?

Don't see why not. That or buy new wheels with more offset ! I needed a sure trac anyhow, so built one to replace the peg leg '64 rear assembly.