Gentlemen,
I also suggest the 7 blade fan with a thermostatically controlled fan clutch and shroud. It seems to me that Mopar engineering supplied that setup with a big block and A-C, the only difference was the water pump was OVERDRIVEN, at about 3x crankshaft RPMs to circulate coolant at a higher VELOCITY. Once again the issue of radiators is not the materials of construction, or the number of tubes from the hot tank to the cold tank, but the number of "fins per inch" on the air side. These fins are the heat exchange component. You should also consider a HIGHER temperature thermostat, as this determines the coolant temp. The design criteria is the LMTD or the logrithmic mean or temp difference between what is being cooled (coolant temp) and the temperature you are trying to cool it with (air inlet temp) and the greater the difference, the more heat is exchanged. Velocity thru the radiator (coolant side) usually expressed in feet/second or sometimes as gallons/minute is a calculatable quantity. A rule of thumb is approx 20 to 30 ft/second. Another aspect is the specific heat of the coolant, which is coolants ability to absorb heat and then release it to the cooling media (air stream) Ask the radiator supplier what his design factors are. He will likely say xxxHP. But this number must be converted to BTU/Hr to make a heat exchange calcuation (most suppliers don't know). Electric fans are OK, but their Cubic Feet Minute capacity must be known as well as their static pressure capability must be known. Propeller fans have low static pressure capabilities (either in front of the rad or the engine side of the rad) and they will only move air equal to their area presented. if the static pressure presented to the fan, exceeds their design, air flow will be low. This design point is called the fan curve, which graphically shows the fans capability. But....the above information is my opinion, based on many years of heat exchanger design.
Cheers,
RJ Renton