This opinion shows inaccurate. Much depends on displacement as well as many other factors. 600cfm could be right for one engine but wrong for another. How is this? It falls under what type of useage it is going to be used for.
600 CFM is enough CFM to make the power.
Truly the worst statement is "Especially the Edelbrock carbs." This just sells me you do not know how to tune them. The net and Rod kit is really not complicated. Basic math takes a few seconds. The Holley may tune with a jet kit but there is so much more to tuning a Holley than a simple jet change and anyone thinking otherwise is just fooling themselfs. Hopefully, not others.
[QUOTE/]
But overall , you dont really give us enough info in your post , are you tuning for idle or power ? wide open throttle ? what are you measuring your air fuel ratio with ? do you have a wideband O2 like a LM-1 or are you tuning by ear or smell or reading the plugs ?
The best part of you reply. And actually helping.
[QUOTE/]
FWIW on my 12 second at 108 mph 1970 Dart with a built 360 I ran an 850 DP, the weight HP calculator puts it around that 400hp mark
These statements can be misleading. The OP is or could be lead to believe that his 360 now needs an 850 carb.
If this was a realitively mild engine, compression and camshaft wise, 600cfm's could very well be fine on top.
We also very much so could use some more information;
Compression ratio
Cam spec's @.050
What type of trans and if an auto, what stall converter speed is being used
Gear ratio and tire size
Intended useage of the vehicle
Track time vs. street time 90/10 - 50/50
What car again?
This engine was dyno'd? With what carb?
Many factors! But a in general question can get a in general answer.