• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Chevy halts production of the Volt.

Richard Cranium

FBBO Gold Member
FBBO Gold Member
Local time
9:46 PM
Joined
Feb 20, 2012
Messages
65,740
Reaction score
238,446
Location
Maskachusetts
Now, there's a shocker. These things are selling worse than Aztecs & I'm surprised that it's taken this long for GM to idle the plant.


DETROIT — General Motors said on Friday that it planned to halt production of the Chevrolet Volt for five weeks beginning later this month because dealers had more than they needed.

The suspension, which will result in temporary layoffs for 1,300 workers at the Detroit plant that builds the Volt, is another troubling sign for the plug-in hybrid, whose sales fell short of G.M.’s targets in 2011. G.M. officials had already backed away from projections that they could sell 45,000 Volts in the United States this year, instead saying that production would match demand.


Production is scheduled to stop March 16 and resume April 23, a G.M. spokesman, Chris Lee, said. It will be the third time that Volt production has been stopped for at least a month since the car first went on sale in December 2010. G.M. tripled the plant’s production capacity during downtime last summer, and the plant was down for all of January in preparation for building a lower-emission version that is eligible for car pool lanes in California.

“Sales for the Volt in February were significantly better than January, and we anticipate that to continue,” Mr. Lee said. “We see good things in the future, but right now we had to make this adjustment.”

G.M. sold 1,023 Volts in February, up from 603 in January, on the heels of a federal investigation into the possibility that its battery pack could catch fire after a severe crash. Regulators concluded that the car was no more dangerous than a traditional gasoline-powered vehicle, though G.M. agreed to strengthen the structure around the battery.

G.M. said it had about 3,600 Volts in inventory. Last year, officials repeatedly dismissed questions about low sales numbers by saying the company could not build enough of the cars to meet demand. It ended up selling 7,671 during the year, instead of the 10,000 it had anticipated.
The halt also affects the Opel Ampera, a newer twin of the Volt that is being exported to Europe. They are the only models now built at G.M.’s Detroit-Hamtramck plant, which is preparing to add the Chevrolet Malibu later this year and the Chevrolet Impala next year.

The Volt, which costs $41,000 before a $7,500 federal tax credit for electric vehicles, has become a favorite target of conservative commentators and lawmakers, who say it is too expensive and is being artificially supported by taxpayer money.

“Even as gas prices continue to climb, President Obama’s attempt to manipulate the free market and force consumers into purchasing electric vehicles like the G.M. Volt has failed,” Representative Darrell Issa, Republican of California, said in a statement. “Now some 1,300 workers will pay the price for this misguided experiment.”
 
$41,000 golf cart.:eek:
a lot more than that if the taxpayer subsidies are included. it may sell better if it was renamed the Obamamobile. i was for the bailout of GM and Chrysler in the beginning but now i feel as if it was a taxpayer rip-off.
 
The solution is simple. All Obama has to do is mandate that anyone who can afford to buy one should be required to purchase one. Hey, if it works for health insurance and rubbers, why not for Government Motors.

Volt just another Edsel
 
Another brilliant Obama pipe dream goes down in flames.....
 
a $41000.00 car...............supposed to get great mileage....... save gas...........but it costs $41000.00....good for the environment..................but it costs $41000.00.....how much is a Cobalt again???? someone needs to re-take economics class...WHERES THE SAVINGS???? no whoa bundy on this one
 
Man you all are totally missing the point on this Volt, and, listening to too much of Republican conservative AM radio stations. The Volt is an amazing piece of technology! Linking it to bail-outs is crude, but accurate to a degree. The chatter about this car in a negative manner is disingenuous at least. I've been following this car from its inception to now. GM has overcome some massive obstacles to make this vehicle.

Who benefits from seeing the VOLT go down in failure? I'll tell you; the Oil Corporations. Imagine if everyone, or, even 10% of the population drove Volts, the amount of gasoline consumption would decline perhaps 7 or 8%, this is an amazing number! I personally would love to own a Volt! I mean driving that puppy to my shop I would never need gasoline! It is about 8 miles one way, drive there, drive home, drive to lunch, charge up at night! And, any extra driving, the gasoline engine kicks in and renders a charge to the battery pack!
 
For 41k I would want this car to get 100 miles on a charge, not 25. I've wondered how much it would add to my electric bill if I had to charge it's battery every night. I live in NH where we have some of the highest electric rates in the nation.
The carbon footprint of this car is worse than any SUV.
I saw a show where a collector had bought a two seater coupe, (can't remember what brand car) from the estate of Smokie Yunich. Smokie had made some simple mods to the engine and the car got 50-60 mpg, with almost zero emissions. We can put a man on the moon and a unmanned explorer on Mars but we can't figure out how to make a gas powered car get 100 mpg.
 
Thank you Donny..

Breaking this country's addiction is the biggest thing any one person can not only do for this country but the world as well.... Our foreign policies are dictated by our need for oil. There are more than enough alternatives out there.. and guess what you short sighted only read and hear what you want to hear people neglected to talk about the rest of the obama car line that is selling quite well to the point that factories have hired back and workers are complaining about over time.. do some reading .. not just seeing a few pictures and then jumping on what ever popular bandwagon you can find...
What Obama did is actually paying off ... It takes time to turn the wreck that this country was around... took 10 years of war and decreased revenue to put us where we were at.. it takes more than a year or two to try and fix things and especially when you have one party who's only concern is to say what ever it takes to get back in the drivers seat for the 1%... Guess what kiddies.. that 1% drove us into the ground for 8 years while it lined it's pockets....

And guess what else: Romney instituted universal health care in Mass and it works.. But according to his party ( the repulsicans) it cant work and is against the constitution and humanity... OOOPS big hypocritical mistake there.. don't here much about it anymore do you?? Face it the guy hasnt been a bad president and has turned things around. Not The guy before was exceptionally bad. Getting people to buy and electric car is a tough sell but he did the right thing and we need the Volt to survive and to selll and evolve and ford and dodge need to follow ... we wont ever get rid of our need for oil until its gone but we dont need to be lead around by a nose ring by it either....
 
For 41k I would want this car to get 100 miles on a charge, not 25. I've wondered how much it would add to my electric bill if I had to charge it's battery every night. I live in NH where we have some of the highest electric rates in the nation.
The carbon footprint of this car is worse than any SUV.
I saw a show where a collector had bought a two seater coupe, (can't remember what brand car) from the estate of Smokie Yunich. Smokie had made some simple mods to the engine and the car got 50-60 mpg, with almost zero emissions. We can put a man on the moon and a unmanned explorer on Mars but we can't figure out how to make a gas powered car get 100 mpg.


The minute you do the oil companies buy the rights to it or murder the person and take it.

GM had a great electric car in the earlty 90's and GM and the oil companies got rid of it over night... IN the past 8 years oil companies have broken profit records every year breaking the previous years record...

Its all about money and nothing more and big oil was/is big money.. Obama was/is a threat to that and that 1% knows/knew it far to well.. problem is they cant find a platform to not show how greedy they are so they wont win the next election either.. and thank go.. there isnt a good candidate in the bunch of them
 
There are none so blind, than those who will not see! I think every democrat should have to buy one. Most stay home on the draw anyway. 25 miles a day is enough for them to travel a day anyway. GM will be going under again. Obama the worst president ever.

Thank you Donny..

Breaking this country's addiction is the biggest thing any one person can not only do for this country but the world as well.... Our foreign policies are dictated by our need for oil. There are more than enough alternatives out there.. and guess what you short sighted only read and hear what you want to hear people neglected to talk about the rest of the obama car line that is selling quite well to the point that factories have hired back and workers are complaining about over time.. do some reading .. not just seeing a few pictures and then jumping on what ever popular bandwagon you can find...
What Obama did is actually paying off ... It takes time to turn the wreck that this country was around... took 10 years of war and decreased revenue to put us where we were at.. it takes more than a year or two to try and fix things and especially when you have one party who's only concern is to say what ever it takes to get back in the drivers seat for the 1%... Guess what kiddies.. that 1% drove us into the ground for 8 years while it lined it's pockets....

And guess what else: Romney instituted universal health care in Mass and it works.. But according to his party ( the repulsicans) it cant work and is against the constitution and humanity... OOOPS big hypocritical mistake there.. don't here much about it anymore do you?? Face it the guy hasnt been a bad president and has turned things around. Not The guy before was exceptionally bad. Getting people to buy and electric car is a tough sell but he did the right thing and we need the Volt to survive and to selll and evolve and ford and dodge need to follow ... we wont ever get rid of our need for oil until its gone but we dont need to be lead around by a nose ring by it either....
 
I love this site so much....someone can actually voice their opinion/state facts on Obama/the government and not get banned/locked.
 
The Volt is an expensive car, if the government was subsidizing it, it would cost the equivalent of the Cruze. The Volt has some amazing engineering in it, hands down. All good things take a while to be accepted. The Volt is one of them. Will I trade my Challenger in for it; likely not. But, I would own one if my Challenger was payed off, absolutely I would!
 
99ss. I do remember the GM electric cars back in the 90's. I think they were only being sold in CA and one day GM refused to sell anymore and strongarmed the people that did own them to return them, claiming serious safety issues with the batteries.

GM was working on the Volt Long before Obama took office.

Romney didn't have much of a choice with the universal healthcare in MA since it's the most liberal state east of the Mississippi. Check and see when was the last time liberal MA had a balanced budget, when Romney was in office. MA also has no-fault auto insurance. So even if you have zero accidents and tickets you still pay close to what the worst drivers do, you know, spread the wealth.

How many billions of $$ does the Post Office lose a year? And that job is basically delivering a piece of paper from one mailbox to another. If our inept government can't deliver mail I don't see how it can manage a complex medical system. The only way they will see how to fund it will be the same way it's funded in all the other socialist countries. With taxes on gasoline. This is the reason they are paying over 7.00/gallon. With in ten years we will be paying close to 10.00/gallon to fund our universal health care system. And the republicans will blame Obama and the democrats will blame Bush, some things will never change.
 
Now, there's a shocker. These things are selling worse than Aztecs & I'm surprised that it's taken this long for GM to idle the plant.


DETROIT — General Motors said on Friday that it planned to halt production of the Chevrolet Volt for five weeks beginning later this month because dealers had more than they needed.

The suspension, which will result in temporary layoffs for 1,300 workers at the Detroit plant that builds the Volt, is another troubling sign for the plug-in hybrid, whose sales fell short of G.M.’s targets in 2011. G.M. officials had already backed away from projections that they could sell 45,000 Volts in the United States this year, instead saying that production would match demand.


Production is scheduled to stop March 16 and resume April 23, a G.M. spokesman, Chris Lee, said. It will be the third time that Volt production has been stopped for at least a month since the car first went on sale in December 2010. G.M. tripled the plant’s production capacity during downtime last summer, and the plant was down for all of January in preparation for building a lower-emission version that is eligible for car pool lanes in California.

“Sales for the Volt in February were significantly better than January, and we anticipate that to continue,” Mr. Lee said. “We see good things in the future, but right now we had to make this adjustment.”

G.M. sold 1,023 Volts in February, up from 603 in January, on the heels of a federal investigation into the possibility that its battery pack could catch fire after a severe crash. Regulators concluded that the car was no more dangerous than a traditional gasoline-powered vehicle, though G.M. agreed to strengthen the structure around the battery.

G.M. said it had about 3,600 Volts in inventory. Last year, officials repeatedly dismissed questions about low sales numbers by saying the company could not build enough of the cars to meet demand. It ended up selling 7,671 during the year, instead of the 10,000 it had anticipated.
The halt also affects the Opel Ampera, a newer twin of the Volt that is being exported to Europe. They are the only models now built at G.M.’s Detroit-Hamtramck plant, which is preparing to add the Chevrolet Malibu later this year and the Chevrolet Impala next year.

The Volt, which costs $41,000 before a $7,500 federal tax credit for electric vehicles, has become a favorite target of conservative commentators and lawmakers, who say it is too expensive and is being artificially supported by taxpayer money.

“Even as gas prices continue to climb, President Obama’s attempt to manipulate the free market and force consumers into purchasing electric vehicles like the G.M. Volt has failed,” Representative Darrell Issa, Republican of California, said in a statement. “Now some 1,300 workers will pay the price for this misguided experiment.”

"Now, there's a shocker."- No pun intended? LOL
Just like Solyndra another failed attemtpt to minipulate what the people want by forcing a worthless unthoughtout product/agenda...
"We are the gov't and we are here to help"... Words NOT to live by
 
I resent it when someone tells me that I'm listening to too much conservative hog wash or too much liberal hog wash etc. I try and do my research and I'm willing to listen to other people's opinions without labeling them. This is a problem with many of us and will separate the country and I see this president doing it to us all the time. The left vs the right and on and on. Stop the insanity!

As for the bailout of the auto makers, I was for it at first then against it but on the other hand, there was no one else out there that could or were willing to loan them the amount of money required to keep them from going belly up so the gooberment was the only choice. Should we have let them die or would this country be better off saving them? Our politicians have already gave away too much of our manufacturing base as it is but I'm also against the gooberment interfering with the private sector. Where does it stop?

As for the Volt....is it really good for the environment? Yeah, it uses less gas but how much does it cost in fuel costs (both nat gas and coal) to produce the electricity to charge it up? And that doesn't include the battery disposal later on. Just to build any car means pollution production. Let's get down to the 'total' environmental impact of the Volt vs a similar gas eater from start to finish then we can argue if electric cars are good for us. Imo, I don't think they are but what about nat gas? We have a huge abundance of nat gas and it's pretty clean and you don't have to run a coal fired electric plant to produce it. Another question...how much nat gas does it take to produce enough energy to run that Volt 100 miles vs if it ran on nat gas instead of electricity? And has anyone ever thought about how much fuel the military uses?

Trucking is another high user of fuel and nat gas could/would be a huge plus in that area. Why can't we put more focus on our rail system and get some of these fuel hogs off the highways? There's so many other areas where we could make a bigger and better dent than for the gooberment to subsidize an electric car that isn't very popular....
 
Volt

I resent it too that I am listening to too much consevative radio. I am a Rebublican and proud of it ! As for the Volt I could care less if it fails. The technology is just not there just yet. I will never drive a glorified flashlignt. We have lots of alternatives, like natural gas, our local utility trucks has been using it for years with not much modification. Our B Bodies could run on it if necessary. There is also coal gas, South Africa has been using it with a company named Sasol. Germany used it in WWII, synthetic fuels, what happend to that technolgy ? We have hundreds of years of coal and nat gas, we can get off foreign oil. Global warming, hah, Al Gore is the biggest contributor ! We better watch ourselves with all these changes in our laws with our freedoms, first amendment rights , second amendment rights etc., with big government telling us what is good for us. Pretty soon they will tell us our muscle cars are killing the air and people and force us off the road forever !
 
I resent it too that I am listening to too much consevative radio. I am a Rebublican and proud of it ! As for the Volt I could care less if it fails. The technology is just not there just yet. I will never drive a glorified flashlignt. We have lots of alternatives, like natural gas, our local utility trucks has been using it for years with not much modification. Our B Bodies could run on it if necessary. There is also coal gas, South Africa has been using it with a company named Sasol. Germany used it in WWII, synthetic fuels, what happend to that technolgy ? We have hundreds of years of coal and nat gas, we can get off foreign oil. Global warming, hah, Al Gore is the biggest contributor ! We better watch ourselves with all these changes in our laws with our freedoms, first amendment rights , second amendment rights etc., with big government telling us what is good for us. Pretty soon they will tell us our muscle cars are killing the air and people and force us off the road forever !

I agree..But lets not forget about the EV1..this is a quote from a auto show..The EV1 was a marvel of engineering, absolutely the best electric vehicle anyone had ever seen. Built by GM to comply with California's zero-emissions-vehicle mandate, the EV1 was quick, fun, and reliable. It held out the promise that soon electric cars — charged from the grid with all sorts of groovy power sources, like wind and solar — could replace the smelly old internal-combustion vehicle. And therein lies the problem: the promise. In fact, battery technology at the time was nowhere near ready to replace the piston-powered engine. The early car's lead-acid bats, and even the later nickel-metal hydride batteries, couldn't supply the range or durability required by the mass market. The car itself was a tiny, super-light two-seater, not exactly what American consumers were looking for. And the EV1 was horrifically expensive to build, which was why GM's execs terminated the program — handing detractors yet another stick to beat them with. GM, the company that had done more to advance EV technology than any other, became the company that "killed the electric car."

Read more: http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/article/0,28804,1658545_1658544_1658535,00.html #ixzz1oBPTnmeP
 
Auto Transport Service
Back
Top