- Local time
- 10:22 AM
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2012
- Messages
- 69,138
- Reaction score
- 258,372
- Location
- New Hampster
Much of what I've read about the Concorde was negative as far as design and construction quality was concerned. General airworthiness was an issue as the aircraft could be difficult to fly at low speed and altitude. It could be very unforgiving of small pilot errors that normally wouldn't be a problem in a sub-sonic airliner. I've always wondered if Boeing had built It's SST if it would have been a much better aircraft. We'll never know.
Wasn't it built by the French ??, not the best choice for commercial aviation... In my opinion anyway, hell they build crappy cars, what would make anyone think they could build a quality Airliner, that goes into super-sonic air speeds... I know I wouldn't...
- - - Updated - - -
when I was young I thought they were cool because they were so fast...LOL...
I think they were built in France by a partnership of French and British companies with government support. The Brits built some nice cars like Rolls and Bentley, but the reliability of the rest of their stuff can leave you on foot. At least when their cars crap out you can just roll off to the side of the road. With their aircraft, that's not an option.