Wow! cant believe i didn't see this thread all day!!! lol
i'm pretty much in the same boat as you, Pabster....lookin for something solid for the house....
I like this one;
http://www.sigsauer.com/CatalogProductDetails/p229.aspx
haven't shot it yet, but i think i can rent a reasonable facsimile here;
http://www.gunworldrange.com/Home_Page.html
(It's in Lombard, IL for any of you other flatlanders out there. lol) .
but then i get to thinking...a semi-auto pistol would be nice for target practice, but if it's going to be at hand in the house, it needs to be a guaranteed man-stopper.
a .357 mag fits the bill nicely. revolvers rarely ever jam (only if you don't take care of them) and if you happen to miss with the first volley, just the sound will make anybody **** their pants and run out!!!
if they're stupid, you still have 5 more shells to defend the homestead.
Don't get too hung up on whether your ammunition is a "manstopper", or transferred energy, or any other hyper-technical aspect of shooting if you just need a gun for home protection. Control and ease of shooting is far more important than "manstoppers" for several reasons.
First, most likely you'll never shoot anyone, but if you do you're going to be scared, panicked, and have adrenaline pumping though you like you've never experienced before. In these situations, even trained, experienced, shooters tend to fire-until-empty. The LAPD did a study back in the 50's/60's dealing with this. They interviewed cops who had just been in shootings and asked how many times they fired. Many cops were sure they had fired two or three shots, but examination of their revolvers showed they had not only fired all five or six shots but all the primers had multiple hammer stikes, meaning the cops had continued pulling the trigger after the gun was empty without ever realizing it. A great case of this condition was the Diallo shooting where cops fired 41 shots. They didn't shoot that many times on purpose, it's just that when you are in full fear for your life, you fire without thinking about how many times you're pulling the trigger. So worrying about whether a single shot is a "manstopper" is mostly a waste of time because most likely you'll be emptying your gun at an intruder, and even a .22 will kill or incapacitate someone in that situation.
Second, if you look at the outcomes of most defensive home shootings, you'll see that it's rare for the bad guy to be found dead at the residence. Most of the time they are found dead after fleeing the house or they turn up wounded at the hospital. This is because despite all the times shooters hear about, or practice, targeting the center mass (chest) to put the bad guy down in his tracks, these situations are never like practice and when they go into panic mode and rapid fire high-recoil catridges like .357 Magnums, .44 Magnums, .45 ACP, etc., muzzle climb and lateral movements kick their aim to pieces and they do no more damage than someone with more controllable .38 Special or 9 MM would do.
Lastly, larger caliber ammunition such as .357 Magnum, .44 Magnum, .45 ACP, etc., is a lot more expensive than .38 Special or 9 MM, and the more expensive ammo is, the less you're going to want to fire it at practice. You can get around this with .357 Magnum revolvers by firing cheaper .38 Special rounds with it, but felt recoil with the .38 Special is much less than a .357 Magnum, so your practice isn't going to be very realistic.
Go with a good 9 MM pistol like a Sig/Sauer, or a .38 Special revolver to start with and you'll be much better off than getting some hand cannon.
![Smile :) :)]()