Is that still a fox? it's a totally different body- MUCH less headroom, and no more hatchbacks.
I almost bought an NSX in 1995, when you could find one for 8-10K, if you looked hard enough.
Not really an import guy (but do like some selective ones like, ahem, Unimogs), and had just started my "new" job.
Also almost bought a "carport find" 67 912- original and solid EVERYTHING for $3500!
How about this for a potentail universal "muscle car' definition:
A car that has a specifically designed, higher performance version of the engine normally installed in the standard model (not just larger), and has special exterior badging/striping with the intent to create an image, and call attention to the special perfomance.
This would solve a couple of problems.
1- It makes a 1970 318-2 barracuda, a pony car, but a 340 Cuda, a "muscle car" version of a pony car.
2- It makes a 1955 C-300 a muscle car. (I for one, contend that this car, and not the GTO, was in fact, the first).
3- It does not make a 30's supercharged Cord, a musclecar. IIRC, there was no other powertrain available, and there was, AFAIK, no "special" badging.
4- It does make a 66 Coronet 383 a muscle car (heh,heh).
The counterpoints could be-
What about chevies that have 283, 350, and even 400 emblems on 2 barrel cars?
What about max wedge cars, with no badging? (factory race cars?)
What about 30's V8 fords? (wasn't there only one flathead version?)
What about Olds Rocket 88? (was there another engine option, was there a "standard". "non-rocket" 88 in the same body style?)
Feel free to ruminate.
I for one, have never even liked the term "muscle car".