Dibbons
Well-Known Member
- Local time
- 7:38 AM
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2014
- Messages
- 4,858
- Reaction score
- 5,757
- Location
- La Paz, B.C.S., Mexico
Background article:
http://www.hemmings.com/mus/stories/2013/08/01/hmn_feature3.html
I just can't believe this 1972 Satellite Sebring Plus with a 400 torqueflite, 3.55 sure-grip, and G60-15 tires is doing elapsed times of 13.89 at 98.5 MPH. This is "stock" with the following "modifications": rebuilt Thermoquad, re-curved distributor, new timing chain, valve job and springs, with stock exhaust manifolds and dual exhaust. I don't see any of the mods adding up to 35 rear wheel horsepower or more. Factory rating of 255 net horsepower, shipping weight of 3761# minus 50# (no spare or jack) plus 180# for driver = 3891#. Let's just say 3900# then. For a trap speed of 98.5 MPH we need about 290 rear wheel horsepower (The 1972 440 was rated at 280 net HP that year). Using the 1972 400 CID factory rating of 255 rear wheel horsepower (which looks about right) the car should be doing a best of 14.40 @ 94.61 or so. That's a half-second slower than what is claimed in the article.
http://www.hemmings.com/mus/stories/2013/08/01/hmn_feature3.html
I just can't believe this 1972 Satellite Sebring Plus with a 400 torqueflite, 3.55 sure-grip, and G60-15 tires is doing elapsed times of 13.89 at 98.5 MPH. This is "stock" with the following "modifications": rebuilt Thermoquad, re-curved distributor, new timing chain, valve job and springs, with stock exhaust manifolds and dual exhaust. I don't see any of the mods adding up to 35 rear wheel horsepower or more. Factory rating of 255 net horsepower, shipping weight of 3761# minus 50# (no spare or jack) plus 180# for driver = 3891#. Let's just say 3900# then. For a trap speed of 98.5 MPH we need about 290 rear wheel horsepower (The 1972 440 was rated at 280 net HP that year). Using the 1972 400 CID factory rating of 255 rear wheel horsepower (which looks about right) the car should be doing a best of 14.40 @ 94.61 or so. That's a half-second slower than what is claimed in the article.