I think it derived from a " ****- hook" , which turned into " pulled a shitter" and now a " shittie.
It's not quite like that. When done correctly, it isn't just the back of the car power sliding. Picture the very center of the car, traveling in a straight line. Now picture the front goes left, the back goes right, and the center continues on in that same line. It is a full revolution, multiple 360's. Full rotations, all 4 tires have no semblence of grip. Multiple rotations, violent, tight rotations like the car was an airplane propeller, but also moving forward at like 30mph.I understand the action, it is the terminology that sounds completely stupid to me. I don't find tossing a car around to be "shitty". I really enjoy it.
I used to call it "getting sideways" before the term drifting caught on.
A general theme for me is that I often see phrases and terms in the literal sense.
Don't say "How are you?" unless you really want my answer.
When you tell me that you need to take a piss, my first thought is Why would you want someone else's piss?
"This tastes like ****"....How do you know that for sure?
It must be because I am wired to look for what I find funny, absurd, silly and entertaining.
Maybe KD doesn't have much snow to play in.It's not quite like that. When done correctly, it isn't just the back of the car power sliding. Picture the very center of the car, traveling in a straight line. Now picture the front goes left, the back goes right, and the center continues on in that same line. It is a full revolution, multiple 360's. Full rotations, all 4 tires have no semblence of grip. Multiple rotations, violent, tight rotations like the car was an airplane propeller, but also moving forward at like 30mph.
It is betond getting sideways, and is essentially impossible to replicate on dry pavement. You can hoon out a car burning the tires and making it go crazy, but not like this.
A lot of the finer points have been lost on today's kids because they don;t have 25 foot long big block powered mega cars to do this stuff in.
If I recall correctly, some of the space shuttle turbomachinery parts came from the Saturn V / Apollo Program. The space shuttle ran the Saturn V turbomachinery beyond the original, intended design...104% of the Saturn V parts. Ran at 104% of the intended speed if I recall correctly. They would have tested the design for the space shuttle application in a requalification program of course.I remember watching the space shuttle launches, listening to the crew saying "main engines throttle up at 104%".
Although I can't say it didn't happen, I would think unlikely. The Saturn V Rocketdyne F-1 engines had three times more thrust than the RS-25 used in the space shuttle, it wouldn't be logical that the turbopumps would need to be run over the original design speed to provide enough fuel for the smaller engines. They weren't the same type of pumps either, as the Space shuttle engine used liquid hydrogen for fuel while the Saturn V main engines burned RP-1 rocket fuel which is kerosene based.If I recall correctly, some of the space shuttle turbomachinery parts came from the Saturn V / Apollo Program. The space shuttle ran the Saturn V turbomachinery beyond the original, intended design...104% of the Saturn V parts. Ran at 104% of the intended speed if I recall correctly. They would have tested the design for the space shuttle application in a requalification program of course.
I do not recall if the Saturn V parts were the LH2 pumps or LOX pumps, but I want to say it was the LH2 pumps.
They weren't the same type of pumps either, as the Space shuttle engine used liquid hydrogen for fuel while the Saturn V main engines burned RP-1 rocket fuel which is kerosene based.
You are of course correct in that, I wasn't thinking of the second stage. I was on my way back here to amend my previous post but I see that you beat me to it.Saturn V second stage is H2 and LOX. So is the third stage, but much smaller
Depending on how informal you want the word usage to be...How about THIS one.....
"Can you go to my house and get my wallet? I know it is a big ASK but I really need it."
No, it isn't an ASK, it is a request, a favor....ASK is a verb.
Remember (Bring it On!) or recently Super something.Oh, I know the misuse of the word. I hear it too often.
I also understand that the language evolves. Part of what annoys me is that some people glom onto some new phrase and say it as if trendy words and such make them interesting or edgy.
But it isn't really a new phrase, I've heard it often for many years. I think it is only misused if people apply it to a trivial need; a 'big ask' should be an important request.Oh, I know the misuse of the word. I hear it too often.
I also understand that the language evolves. Part of what annoys me is that some people glom onto some new phrase and say it as if trendy words and such make them interesting or edgy.