I am no expert on this, but doesn't the manifold and carburetor design also play into this. Early into this the original author states ported vacuum was moved above throttle plate and therefore at idle NO vacuum is seen. That implies no vacuum advance. Yet we know that you have to remove the vacuum hose from the distributor at idle when setting initial, because the ported does have vacuum at idle. It is less than manifold, but it still is there.
Having looked at plenty of the carbs the location of the port does vary therefor the vacuum seen at idle on the port can vary.
Chrysler training video on this subject specifically talking about the Vacuum Retard canister (used on the Hemi) and other cars; explains in broad terms what goes on with vacuum at the various stages at the ported outlet. I am not sure it agrees with the GM concept.
GM and Chrysler design requirements can be different. I don't argue fully with the theory, but I do think the design of the carb and the location of the ported vacuum play.
In the end don't real race cars run without vacuum advance, dial in lots of initial and go all in early in the rpm cycle? So why even get hung up on this. If it is a cruise car, vacuum helps out with efficiency, and sure it can effect acceleration performance if other factors are off.