Well, it only sunk once.The Titanic was supposed to be unsinkable...... oooops.
What was he supposed to do?5he people who built Titanic never said she was unsinkable. That was press clipping hyperbole.
And if the guy in charge on the bridge that night had done what he was SUPPOSED to do, the Titanic would be no more famous than any other liner, cause she would have MISSED the iceberg!
Well, I suppose that's a valid opinion, but was he SUPPOSED to aim for it, or try to avoid it? What was the textbook correct course of action, given that about 50 seconds passed between the lookout sounding the bell, and the collision?It has been said that had they hit it dead straight, they may have only breached 1 or 2 compartments and stayed afloat. As it happened, turning and grazing the edge of the iceberg caused several compartments to be compromised.
Well, I suppose that's a valid opinion, but was he SUPPOSED to aim for it, or try to avoid it? What was the textbook correct course of action, given that about 50 seconds passed between the lookout sounding the bell, and the collision?
Titanic was a three screw ship, with the rudder behind the center screw. ( contemporary opinion is that she was WAY under-ruddered). The two outboard engines were reciprocating, exhaust powering the center turbine engine.What was he supposed to do?
Perhaps partially because there is twice as much land mass in the northern hemisphere?If this is true, it is interesting.....
"87% of the world lives in the northern hemisphere, and only 13% of the world lives in the southern hemisphere."
I can believe it. I'd bet China and India comprise half of the worlds population. Or something close.If this is true, it is interesting.....
"87% of the world lives in the northern hemisphere, and only 13% of the world lives in the southern hemisphere."
Yeah, but 87 to 13 isn't a 2 to 1 comparison. By that argument, the numbers would be closer to 66/34.Perhaps partially because there is twice as much land mass in the northern hemisphere?