Probably. It is on the 5.7 Hemi too. Why change?I'm thinking access will be restricted by the k member, steering rack, and suspension.
Probably. It is on the 5.7 Hemi too. Why change?I'm thinking access will be restricted by the k member, steering rack, and suspension.
It's basically a clean sheet of paper design. Why not improve by having a regular maintenance item be readily accessible from underneath the hood?Probably. It is on the 5.7 Hemi too. Why change?
I'll probably have nightmares tonight...
View attachment 1798091
Also, the oil filter location is interesting.
Looks like it was designed by The Borg.Is there actually an engine under all that stuff?
What makes it harder to diagnose compared to any modern car where you would check for codes as the first step?As a mechanic having to diagnose or work on that is a nightmare. Plain and simple.
i`d like to drive one too ,just for the h--- of it ...I want to drive a hurricane. I love my 2.2 turbos and my Cummins and my ecodiesel. I love boost. And every 4.0 inline six I've had has been freakin' bulletproof.
People should give this thing a chance.
What makes it harder to diagnose compared to any modern car where you would check for codes as the first step?
I can see how the packaging part would make the actual work a PITA. I never had to do any repairs on my 2019 Scat but everything appeared fairly easy to get to.
At least we did get the high performance pick-up with the Viper engine option.I was always surprised that Ram did not bring out a High Performance pick-up with a HellCat option. But now that they $hit-canned the Classic series, they no longer produce a single cab truck.
Agreed, but how many decades ago was that?At least we did get the high performance pick-up with the Viper engine option.
There was the TRX, with the 707 hp 6.2L I believe from memory. More an off road package than canyon carver.I was always surprised that Ram did not bring out a High Performance pick-up with a HellCat option. But now that they $hit-canned the Classic series, they no longer produce a single cab truck.
You mean like these?At least we did get the high performance pick-up with the Viper engine option.
The TRX was definitely a bad-*** mo-chine, but I would have loved if they produced a street truck with the HC and 4wd.
I'd be smokin all of the posers creepin along Chi-raq's streets. Not that I couldn't with a TRX, mind you, but I like the sleeper look.
You hit the nail on the head. I agree, in a high load, low rpm situation the rods are gonna exit.While there are still plenty of new hemi 1500 trucks on the lot, they are all etorque. We tried to find a hemi without etorque in August and they were all gone, that left with the “classic” model. If you want a hemi without etorque you have to buy a 2500, and the wife didn’t really want to drive a 2500 4x4 everyday. We decided on an ecodiesel. No start/stop BS, no etorque, no nanny cruise control or lane assist crap.
The wife and I rented a hurricane ram in Florida a few weeks back. It was pretty fast and claimed an average of 22 mpg over one week and 1k miles, but I can’t believe a turbo engine making over 2 hp per cubic inch is going to have the same longevity as a larger n/a engine.
Travis..
Cummins motors live forever under just those circumstances....and inline motors are by nature, torque monsters. Just look at the old 4.0 Jeep motor. If it was designed properly for the intended use, it should do just fine. Just like the Cummins, and the 4.0.You hit the nail on the head. I agree, in a high load, low rpm situation the rods are gonna exit.
IFCummins motors live forever under just those circumstances....and inline motors are by nature, torque monsters. Just look at the old 4.0 Jeep motor. If it was designed properly for the intended use, it should do just fine. Just like the Cummins, and the 4.0.