Brewzer67
Well-Known Member
- Local time
- 12:25 PM
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2015
- Messages
- 460
- Reaction score
- 427
- Location
- Menomonee Falls, WI
Nice ***!
Nice ***!
Cars of yesterday didn't have to chase the "Efficiency" standards required by today's designers. Thus much more attention to esthetics and fashion fads could be entertained. Some with not so successful results. But many with some of most eye appealing designs of all time. This design "Efficiency" chase starts with aerodynamics. And it turns out the most efficient design that slips thru the air is egg shaped. Unfortunately the "egg" is not esthetically pleasingly. Thus it's tough to get that shape looking sexy. One good modern example? Bugatti Chiron line. Fastest mass produced supercar. (There are faster "Production cars" But very limited availability.) Me? I think the Bugatti is a bit on the ugly duckling side?new cars in general do that to me. Compared to the classics of the '30s to the '50s...no imagination at all.
The Chiron, surprisingly enough, isn't near the top of the list of drag efficient cars. It has a CD of .35, no better than a new Dodge Charger.Cars of yesterday didn't have to chase the "Efficiency" standards required by today's designers. Thus much more attention to esthetics and fashion fads could be entertained. Some with not so successful results. But many with some of most eye appealing designs of all time. This design "Efficiency" chase starts with aerodynamics. And it turns out the most efficient design that slips thru the air is egg shaped. Unfortunately the "egg" is not esthetically pleasingly. Thus it's tough to get that shape looking sexy. One good modern example? Bugatti Chiron line. Fastest mass produced supercar. (There are faster "Production cars" But very limited availability.) Me? I think the Bugatti is a bit on the ugly duckling side?
View attachment 1143756
If I remember right it's because of the rear wing? Even an egg will want to fly at those speeds? No choice but to add drag from a wing to keep it on the ground.The Chiron, surprisingly enough, isn't near the top of the list of drag efficient cars. It has a CD of .35, no better than a new Dodge Charger.
Shinny paint and chrome wheels would go a long way to knocking the ugly off of it.
Harold there ain't enough chrome or shiny paint on the planet to make that Fugly thing appealing to me..I don't care how fast it is.
Second pic is a 56 Chrysler tail light, But none of the 56 Chryslers had a gas cap behind the light. The side trim shown , is not Chrysler, so this must be from a custom car. I really like the 56 Chry. tail lights, just one of the reasons I bought one. .........................MO