69hemibeep
Well-Known Member
I used a 950 in the early 70s, used a gear drive to the 3rd barrel and an accelerator pump adapter that put long squirters into the back barrel. It worked great.
I did the squirter thing with a 50cc pump. I settled on the original 30cc pump, .028 squirter and blue #427 pump cam. Thing drove very well.I used a 950 in the early 70s, used a gear drive to the 3rd barrel and an accelerator pump adapter that put long squirters into the back barrel. It worked great.
thats what is on mine. with a gear drive deal to make it a full on everything at once deal.I used a 950 in the early 70s, used a gear drive to the 3rd barrel and an accelerator pump adapter that put long squirters into the back barrel. It worked great.
The secondary side was turned into an oval. Or more simply, the metal in between the two barrels was removed.
The advantage the 3bbl had was more venturi area giving more air capacity. Keep in mind this is mid '60's technology and double pumpers and dominators haven't arrived yet. Also, Nascar dictated single carbs.I prefer carburetors over fuel injection because of their simplicity and i have a basic understanding of how they work. But i'm far from being an expert.
That being said, what are the advantages and disadvantages of this 3bbl vs. the standard 4bbl design?
This is the only place I have ever heard of people limping the 3bbl carb, having successfully used them. All I ever heard was curse words after the words, “3bbl.”I prefer carburetors over fuel injection because of their simplicity and i have a basic understanding of how they work. But i'm far from being an expert.
That being said, what are the advantages and disadvantages of this 3bbl vs. the standard 4bbl design?
I think most of the 3bbl problems were people trying to re-engineer them. Thèy're best kept as designed.
So if left stock are there any downsides compared to a regular 4bbl carburetor?
More air = more power but it's probably not that simple?
A 3bbl is just a modified 4bbl. Same concept as any vacuum secondary holley. The problem with a 3bbl today is parts. The front half will use basic holley jets, power valve, and gaskets. The secondary side uses a unique metering plate and gaskets and the real issue is finding a vacuum diaphragm which is unique too. Keeping all the choke assembly helps the carb be a little more colder climate friendly. 3bbl's are just an attempt to put a race carb on the street. They really do drive well. I think one, with all the parts, would be fun on a ch4b. I still have my 3bbl, but needs parts, and a ch4b laying around.So if left stock are there any downsides compared to a regular 4bbl carburetor?
More air = more power but it's probably not that simple?
I tried light springs too and they don't work. No kill bleed means the secondaries flop open without a stiff spring.The 1050 I had did okay but I put it on where I had a 850 double pumper I had cut the choke tower off, put two rios on and spray tube orfice set them , hogged, zip tubed, vent baffled 4 corner jetted and put a 4.5 power valve in it with the 310 SS solid. It was like having coil springs launch from the stab, tried the 3 barrel and it went about 15 feet before the power really came on because of the vacuum time, I may have opened the vacuum channel up and used a lighter spring to make it hit quicker, but I just went back to the 850 and took the gas mileage difference on the road.
Here’s my take on it. Despite what I have personally heard and read here.So if left stock are there any downsides compared to a regular 4bbl carburetor?
More air = more power but it's probably not that simple?
I bet! Muha ha ha ha… It has “That SOUND!!!!!”I have very nice 950 that I can post some quality photos of tomorrow for viewing.
There are super fun to use and like a QJ or Thermo Quad they sound great when the secondaries open up.
Tom
I bet! Muha ha ha ha… It has “That SOUND!!!!!”
Could you tell me the area or at least the dimensions of the secondary side?