And So It Begins - Tremec TKX Conversion Into A 64 Polara

[CoronetDarter]

View attachment 1810162
I know that I'm within required specs (.005), and I'm at .0025, but I may try to get the numbers closer to zero if I can. There are members who have struggled with getting their numbers within specs and have spent a lot of time getting this right, but maybe the stars were just lined up for me.

I was one of those members that struggled to get within SST specs. It was first-timers learning curve; once I figured it out everything fell into place. You can attempt to drive the TIR down for fun, but it's not necessary. Once the bell is within spec you're good to go. Did you use the RobbMc offset dowels?

 

[Charlie Brown]

I was one of those members that struggled to get within SST specs. It was first-timers learning curve; once I figured it out everything fell into place. You can attempt to drive the TIR down for fun, but it's not necessary. Once the bell is within spec you're good to go. Did you use the RobbMc offset dowels?

I used SST supplied dowels - identical to RobbMc. The price however, is a lot more expensive for the SST dowels. $79 at SST and $39 at RobbMc. I have been dealing with SST with pedal / clutch master cylinder connection issues and they were shipping me an updated item so I asked them to slip in a set of dowels in the same package. Maybe should have done a bit more homework.

 

[savoy64]

I received my offset dowels (.007) this week and installed them. First crack on the dial indicator read .005 TIR - so .0025 total run out. View attachment 1810162View attachment 1810163
I know that I'm within required specs (.005), and I'm at .0025, but I may try to get the numbers closer to zero if I can. There are members who have struggled with getting their numbers within specs and have spent a lot of time getting this right, but maybe the stars were just lined up for me.
While I have the trans out, I took the liberty to change out my oil pan from a 4 qt, unbaffled 187 pan to a baffled, 6 qt max wedge pan.
View attachment 1810167View attachment 1810168
Unfortunately, I was unable to keep my windage tray - they don't agree with each other.
As I was installing the new pan, you guessed it, I pulled the threads out of the block on the last pan rail bolt, which also happened to be the hardest one to install (above the cross member). I wasn't going to accept engine removal to fix this, so I was able to install a bolt that was longer than the original and was able the catch enough "good" remaining threads. The last few turns of the socket was a little nerve racking.

We got lucky on mine. Initial final runout was .003. I had a 727 with 3500 turbo-action converter and valve body, trans cooler, etc. 9 inch pppford with.364 gears and 522 stroker. I can now keep up with traffic on the highway( not being constantly passed by yugos, kias, hyundas , you know). My car actually runs 5-10 degrees cooler and is noticeably smoother/less noisy not to mention better fuel mileage. My only complaint about the TKX is that the 2-3 shift is stiff/balky (Ive got about 2000 miles on it, done in May of 2023). Overall I am a happy camper! Like the max wedge oil pan, we used a 6qt E body pan with windage tray. Had to trim the edges of the k member and massage the front passenger side of the pan with an appropriate tool (hammer)! Your pan is rounder at front passenger side than the Ebody pan. I think you will be very happy with the conversion.

 

[CoronetDarter]

We got lucky on mine. Initial final runout was .003. I had a 727 with 3500 turbo-action converter and valve body, trans cooler, etc. 9 inch pppford with.364 gears and 522 stroker. I can now keep up with traffic on the highway( not being constantly passed by yugos, kias, hyundas , you know).

My Coronet had a 727 with 3,000 stall converter, with 3.55 gears. Driving on the highway was brutal, buzzing along at 3,500+ rpm just to keep up with traffic in the slow lane. Now, the engine turns 2,000 rpm @ 70 mph. And with the low first gear, the car is much snappier off the line. I'm planning on eventually going up to 3.91 gears.

 

[Dennis H]

We got lucky on mine. Initial final runout was .003. I had a 727 with 3500 turbo-action converter and valve body, trans cooler, etc. 9 inch pppford with.364 gears and 522 stroker. I can now keep up with traffic on the highway( not being constantly passed by yugos, kias, hyundas , you know). My car actually runs 5-10 degrees cooler and is noticeably smoother/less noisy not to mention better fuel mileage. My only complaint about the TKX is that the 2-3 shift is stiff/balky (Ive got about 2000 miles on it, done in May of 2023). Overall I am a happy camper! Like the max wedge oil pan, we used a 6qt E body pan with windage tray. Had to trim the edges of the k member and massage the front passenger side of the pan with an appropriate tool (hammer)! Your pan is rounder at front passenger side than the Ebody pan. I think you will be very happy with the conversion.

Got the SST for a better 2-3. The old Keisler balked. Just remember STRAIGHT FORWARD. Forget the H.

 

[66 Sat]

Not sure if you've got the pedals/master cylinder sorted but have you considered the Mal Wood Under Dash Master Cylinder? It's pricey if you've already got the whole kit from SST though.
1962-65 B-BODY MOPAR -Plymouth Satellite Coronet Charger Plymouth GTX – Hydraulic Master Cylinder Clutch Pedal Kit - MalWood USA

I've got this on my car - it makes for a very clean install, just the reservoir in the engine bay (bolted to the brake booster).

 

[Charlie Brown]

Not sure if you've got the pedals/master cylinder sorted but have you considered the Mal Wood Under Dash Master Cylinder? It's pricey if you've already got the whole kit from SST though.
1962-65 B-BODY MOPAR -Plymouth Satellite Coronet Charger Plymouth GTX – Hydraulic Master Cylinder Clutch Pedal Kit - MalWood USA

I've got this on my car - it makes for a very clean install, just the reservoir in the engine bay (bolted to the brake booster).View attachment 1810766

I think this may be a good option for others contemplating this 5 speed install. I would have considered it if I was not already deep into what I have and components received from SST.

 

[Charlie Brown]

Alright, I need some schooling on pedal ratios. I understand the basic math. Pedal pivot to pedal, divided by clutch pivot point. Easy enough, but I'm not sure which clutch pivot point to use. Below is a pic of my clutch pedal.

The stock clutch connection is at "A". So my question is do I use the 3 1/8 inch measurement or the "B" 2 1/2 inch measurement to calculate my pedal ratio (even though I will connect the clutch rod at "A"). "B" would be at right angles to the pedal and "A" is at an offset angle. I'm confused and I need to get this right.

 

[Charlie Brown]

So, I'm pretty sure I've got the pedal thing sorted out. I have at least 30 hours invested in this, probably more. I've been in and out from under the dash countless times.
I've spent way to much time on this. SST's literature on this says it's a no hassle "perfect fit" install. It's not so far. It seems that the early B Bodies are the bastard child. There is no way that this part of the kit was properly engineered to fit my 64.

Researching the internet, and studying the attached material for reference, I have done my best to resolve my pedal issues. All the material I read, suggest a 6.0 pedal ratio as being optimum.

- https://www.mcleodracing.com/blog/how-to-calculate-pedal-ratio-for-hydraulic-linkage/236

See last images of pedals at bottom of page.

- Clutch linkage math - how to

The first photo in the above link was very helpful.

I've fabricated several templates to assist me. In the end, this is what I've come up with.

I moved the master cylinder as far up as possible on the firewall, just below the brake master cylinder mounting plate. I retained the original supplied master cylinder firewall mounting bracket.

Next I removed the OEM clutch pedal arm and fabricated my own arm. In the arm I drilled 3 holes at the following radius's from the pivot point - 2.25 inch (6.4 ratio), 2.875 (5.0 ratio) and 3.125 (4.64 ratio). All allow for 1.4 inch master travel.

Attaching the rod at the 2.25 position (6.4 ratio), results in slight internal bore to piston friction in the last .375 of travel.

Attaching the rod at the 2.875 (5.0 ratio) position, the piston travels freely, without friction / internal interference

Shimming the upper bolt between the firewall adaptor and the master cylinder .225, resulted in changing the master mounted angle. This resulted in being able to use the 2.25 pivot point without friction. This means I am able to use a pedal ratio of 6.4 (preferred) as opposed to 5.0.

I made a beveled adaptor to attach to the firewall mount, .250 thick at the very edge and inserted it between the master and the firewall adaptor. I had to elongate the upper mounting hole in the master to be able to insert the bolt into firewall adaptor. My homemade adaptor slightly skews the bolt angle.

I now have perfect cylinder bore alignment at the 2.25 attachment, which gives me what I was looking for a pedal ratio of 6.4.

SST did send me a new adaptor which seems to work, but it's very bulky and it hits the brake line junction fitting. It will connect to the factory arm, but the resulting pedal ratio will still be only 4.64 - far from ideal.

 

[Charlie Brown]

My next step was to attach the flywheel / clutch assembly to the engine. No problems installing the flywheel, but the clutch was another story. To back up a bit, in the SST supplied instruction material, they make reference to the following -

MAA-05000 clutch installation instructions​

A search of their website does not produce this document. I sent an email to Shane at SST and he sent it to me. Good thing. This is my first clutch install and I needed this document. Contained within is this little nugget - "Once the pressure plate is fully torqued, pay close attention to the pressure plate finger heights. They should all be the same height".
Mine were not. I re-did the whole process several times, all with the same "no go" result.
In the end, it was the top two bolts that were not seating properly - you know, the ones you can't see at the top. It turns out that TWO of the threaded holes in in flywheel were not threaded properly - look at the crud that came out.

After chasing all of the threads, the clutch is now installed properly.

This TKX install is fighting me every step of the way.

I'm hoping the hole I cut in the floor for the shifter will be more forgiving during the trans install.