- Local time
- 11:06 AM
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2013
- Messages
- 3,967
- Reaction score
- 5,178
- Location
- The Red Anvil Dog House
That's a girlie argument.
I suppose, only because I'm arguing with you.
That's a girlie argument.
I suppose, only because I'm arguing with you.
No it's because there were Cuda's before 70
http://www.allpar.com/model/cuda.html1969 saw the first appearance of the 'Cuda designation for a performance Barracuda package. A limited number of 440 Darts and Barracudas were produced. Car Life tested the 'Cuda 440 at 0-60 in 5.6 sec, and 14.0 @ 103 in the quarter mile. They were disappointed; they just couldn't get the car to hook up, it kept spinning the tires instead of racing down the track. (Car Life, June/69). Another period road test, reprinted in Musclecar magazine, backs up the 14-flat quarters, but they also tried it with ten-inch slicks, and ran low 12s. Modern street tires are better than those slicks ...
The '69 Road Runner is a far better looking car than the 70 model and the 1968 Charger is far better looking than either Road Runner.
King Richard has spoken.
You're out of your freakin' mind. :laughing4:
You're out of your freakin' mind. :laughing4:
Always trying to pick a fight. Did I say anything about pre 70?No it's because there were Cuda's before 70
X2.
I'm biased towards the 68-69s but the 70 was the pinnacle of the Runner in my eye.
- - - Updated - - -
Always trying to pick a fight. Did I say anything about pre 70?
You need to get laid dude.
You're out of your freakin' mind. :laughing4:
Well, not exactly. Prior to 1970 cuda was just a slang street name for the barracuda.
It's clear the gray area is 69-70, but 68? No way. Even though it is a girlie argument.
silly girlieman, I'm going to pump u' up
I understand the reference. LMAO, but you may want to re-think how that reads to this croud.
I am not that girlie.
I suppose, only because I'm arguing with you.