monaco66coupe
Well-Known Member
Your good! can't go wrong with that. looks like a nice car, the price is very safe, you can't restore a car like that for the price. Good job.
Your good! can't go wrong with that. looks like a nice car, the price is very safe, you can't restore a car like that for the price. Good job.
yes, WS23 Is the first four of your vin. WS23 a coronet R/T, think I posted on your other question, about non numbers matching, I didn't see this one. 21K for Non matching? I don't know. I just sold my brothers matching 67' GTX beautiful car for 24K. It was fairly priced. True, Chrysler didn't put the vin on the engine in 67', but that engine build date should be very close to the car date, and not after the build date. If it is after, clearly the car doesn't have the original engine. that fact does
Influence its value.My GTX's(2) both have dates on the block of 10 days prior to the scheduled build date or less. My brothers was 9 days. My 67' Chrysler
440 is 3 days prior. So I don't recommend paying the price of a real original for one that Isn't. I wouldn't, and other 67' experts
wouldn't either. Just be cautious, and keep asking questions!
that is true, but not too far. The further away it is, the less likely it is the original, is all I was saying. Plymouth didn't build a hp 67 engine in may or Jun of 66 for a 67'. They started the stamping in July for the Aug build. , not sooner. In the end, the guy that can prove that engine was in that car when new has the more valuable car. 10 days Is a slam dunk. three months, highly unlikely. after the build date, Impossible.LoL
By the way, you have a gorgeous Coronet. I hope my GTX comes out that good!
I am having problems trying to decode this…
Is this a real R/T??
Can anybody give me the correct decoded info???
Thanks again for your help!