PurpleBeeper
Well-Known Member
Eventually the "self driving" technology will be perfected. It seems like we're getting close. No more drunk drivers or sleepy drivers
... but those people are still out there, how is a self driving vehicle traveling 55mph going to react when this guy/gal comes up behind you weaving in and out at 75mph? Can these vehicles function optimally when they are surrounded with other vehicles they can't communicate with? How far away can they see/sense other cars? Too many boneheads making erratic, un-signaled lane changes at all speeds for me to feel comfortable trusting the technology. Not that I ever want to see it happen anyway but I don't think it will be effective until ALL vehicles are autonomous.a real driver speeding, eating and texting while not paying attention to the road
Ahhh, no worries, after just re-reading your post it is I who should apologize. You were clear ..... seems I have a problem with my reading comprehension!To clarify. I want to drive and control my own car. I would rather the speeding, eating, texting drivers have and be using the autonomous feature. Sorry I wasn't clear on my earlier thought.
The commercial where there driving the $90K GMC while they are "clapping their hands"??? And GM pays LOTS of money to these agencies... LOL.. Must be a" young person" thing, cause I don't get it......
My newest is a 97 Dodge diesel powered pickup.....next is a 96 Dakota and then a 95 Dakota.Our newest car is from 1994 and even this is to new / to much tech for my taste.
The drunk drivers will figure out how to do it to keep on driving drunk.....Eventually the "self driving" technology will be perfected. It seems like we're getting close. No more drunk drivers or sleepy drivers
I don't trust it....period!I don't think any of it is going to happen the way people imagine it. One word, Litigation. Who gets the blame when eventually something goes wrong? After all, IT is a good career for a reason. Once a vehicle owner is held responsible for an accident that happened in full autonomous mode, nobody will ever trust it again.
My newest is a 97 Dodge diesel powered pickup.....next is a 96 Dakota and then a 95 Dakota.Our newest car is from 1994 and even this is to new / to much tech for my taste.
The drunk drivers will figure out how to do to keep on driving drunk.....Eventually the "self driving" technology will be perfected. It seems like we're getting close. No more drunk drivers or sleepy drivers
I don't trust it....period!I don't think any of it is going to happen the way people imagine it. One word, Litigation. Who gets the blame when eventually something goes wrong? After all, IT is a good career for a reason. Once a vehicle owner is held responsible for an accident that happened in full autonomous mode, nobody will ever trust it again.
I see the site is still having problems......
One of the reasons I do NOT like all that crap. I disconnected the rear anti-brake controller on my 95 Dakota years ago. Can't stand that pulsating pedal and when it first comes on it makes me react by letting off. It kinda feels like the rear end is starting to wheel hop to me and well, normal reaction is to back off the brakes a bit when that happens. When I started asking questions about doing that I got all kinds of push back on the subject. Hey, grew up with manual cars and learned to handle them and well, that's just the way it is. That's one of the reasons the Viper is still one of my favorites....What happens when somebody coming at you in the other lane decides to cuts in front of you? No signal and there's no way to stop in time, bet it won't maneuver you out of it. I had that happen but was able to maneuver around the a--hole by going into his lane. Slid the car sideways when driver's side rear tire locked up. Today's anti-lock brakes might not allow a maneuver like that. For sure a hands free response wouldn't work and the time for you to react the collision already happened.