Ranger16
Well-Known Member
You are terribly misinformed. In addition to a quick warm up, they maintain engine temperature at or near the stated thermostat temperature.
Last edited:
Having the same issue of 383 overheating. Checked flow with cap off radiator, no signs of circulation. Cap on, let engine warm up, no pressure in upper hose. Stuck thermostat??? Ordered a 180 thermostat, picking up today. Since I have to deal with the antifreeze, going to flush the system after install of new 180. Hopefully that is it, otherwise changing out the water pump.Fortunately it was the thermostat. I installed the thermostat on the left 4 years ago, I think it was a mr gasket 180 degree I think it was the one for 25 bucks. I boiled them up on the stove and the left one stayed closed while the right one (new stant 180F) opened. Not sure if it just failed or got plugged up with rust but it is not usable. I like the stant design, simple is good. So the boilovers were coming from the block getting superheated with no coolant flow.
I popped off thermostat housing expecting to have coolant fall out but it was bone dry from boiling with signs of corrosion. I took the thermostat out and bolted back up without a t-stat, ran about 20 miles on the highway and around town. Took a long time for the engine to get to operating temp as expected but once it did it stayed at 180F and didnt move. Heads, water pump, radiator, all 180F. With the old thermostat the water temp would bounce between 180-220. I'm tempted to run without a thermostat because it runs so cool, it doesnt run quite as well that cold probably will need to retune. For now I'm going to get the system flushed out and install the stant.
View attachment 352352
Have you taken a course in thermodynamics ? For my degree, I have, and I'll explain why you're wrong. In simplistic terms. The heat of the coolant inside the radiator is conducted by the radiator. We're going to assume this as a constant. The coolant entering the radiator is 200 degrees. Since the heat conduction is a constant, if the flow is faster, the temperature of the coolant entering back into the engine is 150 degrees. If the coolant flow is slower,more conduction occurs, so the coolant temp returning into the engine is 100 degrees. The "cooler" coolant can absorb more heat in the engine ,since it's a lower temperature. That's why you have bigger radiators, thicker cores, it takes more time for the coolant to get from start to finish inside the radiator. Ergo, more heat conduction.I quoted this from another site. I'm not getting into a pissing match here.
Removing the thermostat will make the car run cooler... You can't run coolant through a radiator too fast.
First Law of Thermodynamics...
Q=mc(deltaT)
Q = heat removed
m = flow of coolant
c = specific heat capacity of coolant
deltaT = change in temperature of coolant in to coolant out
Using this equation, the faster coolant flows through a radiator, more heat will be exchanged.
One of the problems with this line of reasoning is that part of the equation is usually left out. True, slower coolant will come out of the radiator at a lower temperature. However the advantage of decreased restriction is increased volume. Even if a faster flow means that slightly less heat is pulled out as a gallon goes through the radiator, there are more of those gallons per minute and so resulting in a net increase in heat lost from the medium. I have to agree with Bigal75's post, as it includes the flow as part of the equation.Have you taken a course in thermodynamics ? For my degree, I have, and I'll explain why you're wrong. In simplistic terms. The heat of the coolant inside the radiator is conducted by the radiator. We're going to assume this as a constant. The coolant entering the radiator is 200 degrees. Since the heat conduction is a constant, if the flow is faster, the temperature of the coolant entering back into the engine is 150 degrees. If the coolant flow is slower,more conduction occurs, so the coolant temp returning into the engine is 100 degrees. The "cooler" coolant can absorb more heat in the engine ,since it's a lower temperature. That's why you have bigger radiators, thicker cores, it takes more time for the coolant to get from start to finish inside the radiator. Ergo, more heat conduction.
Not when you have a thermostat as a regulatory device. The pump can only flow a certain volume. The reason for a larger radiator is for the coolant to spend more time for conductivity.One of the problems with this line of reasoning is that part of the equation is usually left out. True, slower coolant will come out of the radiator at a lower temperature. However the advantage of decreased restriction is increased volume. Even if a faster flow means that slightly less heat is pulled out as a gallon goes through the radiator, there are more of those gallons per minute and so resulting in a net increase in heat lost from the medium. I have to agree with Bigal75's post, as it includes the flow as part of the equation.
Yep, but will just switch out thermostats since they are cheap. If that is not it then will deal with the other possibilities as you mentioned. Lower hose is fine, and my heater is bypassed. Was going to do the work this weekend but had to start moving things out of a house that I just flipped earlier than planned. Now also got some free $ to get a 66 Charger that has been sitting for about 20 years at a farm.Red beard, take the thermostat out and test it on the stove to verify whether it opens or not. Other possibilities are failing water pump or air trapped in the cooling passages.