Al K
Well-Known Member
- Local time
- 11:58 AM
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2009
- Messages
- 2,116
- Reaction score
- 611
...Right? Here's the deal: It seems like my 3400 lb. S/S springs should have raised the back of the S.F. a bit more than they did. When I had the stock(+1" ride height) replacement springs from McVeigh's on there,I could tell that they would not work with the rear tire/wheel combo I had. I probably would have installed the S/S springs down the road;just decided to try them while the car was still airborne(on jacks). I'm wondering what a set of 3600# B-body units would do;with a big block and 185 of me in there,I'm sure we're approaching 3600 lbs. Probably more...
Anyway;I've looked at numerous pics of A/SA and B/SA cars(Max Wedge) and noticed that the Mopar Stockers do have a taller rear height-more than what I've got. I know a lot of them run a 30" tall tire;mine are 29". I'm presuming they're running 3400# springs;are these guys getting them re-arched or running something other than the Mopar pieces? Here's a pic of mine;I'd like some opinions and commentary,please. Oh,I did raise the front about an inch;looks great,with just a touch of a nose-down look. No pics of that yet-I will get some...
Anyway;I've looked at numerous pics of A/SA and B/SA cars(Max Wedge) and noticed that the Mopar Stockers do have a taller rear height-more than what I've got. I know a lot of them run a 30" tall tire;mine are 29". I'm presuming they're running 3400# springs;are these guys getting them re-arched or running something other than the Mopar pieces? Here's a pic of mine;I'd like some opinions and commentary,please. Oh,I did raise the front about an inch;looks great,with just a touch of a nose-down look. No pics of that yet-I will get some...