IQ52
Well-Known Member
Again.
There is nothing wrong with running a factory iron intake if you want to. Just be informed as to what the differences are. "Disaster" can be a relative term. My whole life was "ruined" the other day because there were no jelly doughnuts.
And
I would be interested in any empherical evidence that Chuck Lofgren may have, on cylinderhead tests made, wherein the only difference between the engines was the material the cylinderhead was made from. With few exceptions, all I see is people proclaiming as truth, things they heard and have never personally tested. This is the reason I have provided the ONLY TWO examples of this type of iron vs aluminum test, I have EVER FOUND. Now granted, I have done no such tests, and have only searched 20 pages deep into those 118,000 references, so I may have missed something on in there. I make no other proclamation other than their results were interesting.
What if aluminum or iron does make a difference?
What if it doesn't?
I don't believe either way yet, but I lean towards it doesn't.
I just tested a 500 stroker with 906 iron heads on 91 octane this past August. 11.9:1 compression, .160" quench, distributor locked at 39 degrees initial/total and not a hint of detonation. It only made 745 HP.
You seem like a bright lad. Your car does run good!
I just think you have to be smarted (smarted? Duh smarter) than the engine you are building, whether you use iron or aluminum.
There is nothing wrong with running a factory iron intake if you want to. Just be informed as to what the differences are. "Disaster" can be a relative term. My whole life was "ruined" the other day because there were no jelly doughnuts.
And
I would be interested in any empherical evidence that Chuck Lofgren may have, on cylinderhead tests made, wherein the only difference between the engines was the material the cylinderhead was made from. With few exceptions, all I see is people proclaiming as truth, things they heard and have never personally tested. This is the reason I have provided the ONLY TWO examples of this type of iron vs aluminum test, I have EVER FOUND. Now granted, I have done no such tests, and have only searched 20 pages deep into those 118,000 references, so I may have missed something on in there. I make no other proclamation other than their results were interesting.
What if aluminum or iron does make a difference?
What if it doesn't?
I don't believe either way yet, but I lean towards it doesn't.
I just tested a 500 stroker with 906 iron heads on 91 octane this past August. 11.9:1 compression, .160" quench, distributor locked at 39 degrees initial/total and not a hint of detonation. It only made 745 HP.
You seem like a bright lad. Your car does run good!
I just think you have to be smarted (smarted? Duh smarter) than the engine you are building, whether you use iron or aluminum.
Last edited: