• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

UFOs or UAPs are real

Satin is on the rise, with the government planing to ban Christianity, the attorney general of the US declaring Catholicism a terrorist organization.
Our younger people turning their back on God and following satin.
And JR, there are five zones in Antarctica off limits to exploration. Why is this? Theroy is that there maybe alien bases there, or maybe worse?

Definitely a hard push for Satanism and a war on Christianity lately. Obvious as it can be.

One of the ideas I've come across is that the Annunaki rule by zodiacal age. If you'll recall the "Grand Conjunction" of Jupiter and Saturn in 2020, it's considered one of the markers for the beginning of the Age of Aquarius. There are a few other possibilities, but considering everything that's happening, I think the Grand Conjunction was it. The previous Age of Pisces (fish constellation, what a coincidence) would have been the rule of Ea/Yah/Jesus and saw the rise and dominance of Christianity. The Age of Aquarius will see the rule of Enlil Nunamnir's son and chosen heir, Ninurta; aka Moloch/Satan, associated with the planet Saturn -

"But ye have borne the tabernacle of your Moloch and Chiun your images, the star of your god, which ye made to yourselves." - Amos 5:26

"Chiun" supposedly is a poetic mash-up of two words, but refers to Saturn.

Speaking as vaguely as I can to avoid "politics," shortly after the Grand Conjunction, the entire human race was compelled to do a certain thing which some have called "taking the mark of the beast." Another coincidence? Boy, there sure are a lot of them.

Antartica would be the most habitable part of the planet for a race that evolved in the oceans of a world such as Enceladus. It's curious how many of our world leaders like to visit it for no apparent reason, and the timing is also eye opening.
 
Nd9GcSpXIyO4b78LsIRXglDN3MQv03WjUoeRyr8gw&usqp=CAU.jpg
 
While I'm in this thread again, I want to mention the "aquatic ape theory," which states that there are only two mammals which carry fat outside of their muscles - cetaceans (dolphins and whales) and homo sapiens. Other primates carry their fat inside their muscles (and apparently don't like to swim much, if they can do it at all). How did we end up being the only primate with disgusting fat rolls (and a relatively good swimming ability)? The aquatic ape theory says there must have been an ancestral ape that was amphibious, and, through the process of evolution; developed fat on the outside of the muscles to serve as insulation (same as dolphins and whales).

On the other hand, the Bible and Sumerian mythology both speak of another race that mated with human women. Now, "I'm not saying it was aliens," but if they did come from the ocean of an ice moon such as Enceladus, being able to swim and having a layer of insulating fat would make a lot of sense.
 
While I'm in this thread again, I want to mention the "aquatic ape theory," which states that there are only two mammals which carry fat outside of their muscles - cetaceans (dolphins and whales) and homo sapiens. Other primates carry their fat inside their muscles (and apparently don't like to swim much, if they can do it at all).
1683429967449.jpeg
 
Hmm, will have to look into that more (got to go play with new fuel and vapor return line now).
 
While I'm in this thread again, I want to mention the "aquatic ape theory," which states that there are only two mammals which carry fat outside of their muscles - cetaceans (dolphins and whales) and homo sapiens. Other primates carry their fat inside their muscles (and apparently don't like to swim much, if they can do it at all). How did we end up being the only primate with disgusting fat rolls (and a relatively good swimming ability)? The aquatic ape theory says there must have been an ancestral ape that was amphibious, and, through the process of evolution; developed fat on the outside of the muscles to serve as insulation (same as dolphins and whales).

On the other hand, the Bible and Sumerian mythology both speak of another race that mated with human women. Now, "I'm not saying it was aliens," but if they did come from the ocean of an ice moon such as Enceladus, being able to swim and having a layer of insulating fat would make a lot of sense.
Almost every mammal has a fat layer under the skin, outside of the muscles. Take a look at an overfed dog or cat, or a bear. It is the non mammal vertebrates that do not have this fat layer.
 
I've had a few fat dogs but I can't say where their fat is. They never look as bad as we do.
 
I appreciate your post.
The "hangup" with alien sentient life has to do with Adam and Eve, the concept of original sin, and Jesus's sacrifice on the Cross, making THE only way for "mankind" to have a way back to being eternally in the presence of God. If you search for discussions about this, you can draw your own conclusions, but from what I've read, that's a major stumbling point for sentient alien life.
I'll only say one more thing on this to re-iterate what I said above - Adam and Eve and original sin is our story. It's possible that other intelligent living beings that are not human (not mankind) were created elsewhere so Adam and Eve is not connected to them and God chose to not disclose this to us. Our planet Earth is not necessarily the center of the universe and all that there is, it is only so for us who live here.
 


Short summation, evolutionists think there are other explanations for the anatomical features that support the aquatic ape theory, these other explanations fit better with the current thinking on evolution, so those explanations are right because the current thinking on evolution is right.

If we're talking about the existance of UFO's though, and possibly aliens; when did these visits start? Twenty years ago, and all the stories from ancient cultures around the world that sound like UFOs and aliens are pure bunk? Or they've been visiting since ancient times, and the stories have at least an element of truth to them? The Bible and Sumerian mythology both talk about fallen angels or Annunaki breeding with human women. According to popular interpretations of the Bible, the children of the fallen angels were wiped out in the Flood; but I've also seen Christians argue about "2nd incursions of the Nephilim." In Sumerian mythology, interspecies breeding would have resumed after the Flood. If Sumerian mythology is right, than evolution isn't necessarily wrong; but we all have Annunaki dna in us (some more than others). It's worth reconsidering the aquatic ape theory from that angle. You don't have to hang your hat on it, but keep it in mind and see if it gels with other things later.
 
If anyone can make a case that the pre-Abrahamic patriarchs weren't in Sumeria (Akkad, Chaldea), I'd like to hear it. As far as I've been able to discover, they were; which means Sumerian stories that sound like they are about the pre-Abrahamic patriarchs, and resemble Bible stories about the pre-Abrahamic patriarchs, probably are about the pre-Abrahamic patriarchs. If the Sumerian stories are correct, than the pre-Abrahamic patriarchs were the most VIP humans and I wonder who would have been more likely to have authored the Sumerian stories than the patriarchs themselves. It sounds like a world where literacy was not widespread, and anyone who could read and write was probably attached to one of the patriarchs.
 
JR, as you have stated the Sumerian clay tablets are of , if not the oldest, among the oldest written language we have found. Zachary Stitchen has been noted as one of the early researchers to begin arranging those thousands of tablets in a time line order that gives us these stories of the who, what , when, events of the Annunaki. Those tablets HAD to be written by scribes, as noted, the masses were just not literate enough to produce them. Question, those scribes were paid by somebody, so did they write these stories that were true of the times or did they write the story they were paid to write by their employer. What paid the bills, recording history or writing fiction?
 
If the Annunaki existed/exist, they left children. It's pretty easy to tell who the children are, but it won't go down easy for everyone. Think about how India's caste system works. Are they "color blind" in India? India is about 1/6 of the world's population, still living in a system that could well be the original system of the Annunaki. Their historical stories certainly sound like Annunaki stories.

I want to add that the Bible is right about a lot of things, but I agree with Mauro Biglino and Paul Wallis that at least some important parts of it suffer from mistranslation. On top of that, other parts are written in symbology. Those who understood the symbols understand the true meaning.
 
Last edited:
About Sitchin, while I think his take on events is reasonably accurate, his critics are probably right when they say he couldn't/didn't translate the Sumerian tablets. More likely he was a member of a secret society that wanted the info out there. According to Bill Cooper, all secret societies are Luciferian at the top levels, which correlates well with Sumerian mythology. Lucifer is most likely the same as Enlil Nunamnir, who held the highest level of command on Earth. It's the same groups now as it was back then, doing what they always did.

One worrisome thing about Sitchin is that he has Abraham serving Enlil Nunamnir/Lucifer. That is difficult to accept. It may tie in with this article about Plato and Kabbalah - Link

I don't know much about Kabbalah myself - probably because I can't recall anything in the Bible that says "learn Kabbalah."
 
Auto Transport Service
Back
Top