- Local time
- 10:16 AM
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2011
- Messages
- 5,847
- Reaction score
- 7,410
- Location
- White Cloud, MI
No problemo! We're cool.Woops wrong Mike! Sorry. It was an April fools joke
Mike
No problemo! We're cool.Woops wrong Mike! Sorry. It was an April fools joke
Looks like the "seat of the pants" engineering group is hard at work.....applying the "guess and by golley" principles.......try this fancy gizmo works at releasing the 50+ hidden HP, lurking within the engine.....and the GM HEI MODULE is the key to unlocking the elusive hidden HP......what's wrong with the way Chrysler intended ......including the original "points" system........Thanks. Hey will you be doing this mod on the new Taurus?
Looks like the "seat of the pants" engineering group is hard at work.....applying the "guess and by golley" principles.......try this fancy gizmo works at releasing the 50+ hidden HP, lurking within the engine.....and the GM HEI MODULE is the key to unlocking the elusive hidden HP......what's wrong with the way Chrysler intended ......including the original "points" system........
BOB RENTON
It must be difficult to go thru life with a closed mind.We get it.
Anything other than a completely stock vehicle, is pointless , dumb , waste of time and money.
Anyone that changes their car looking for some increased power , reliability , accessibility, performance of any kinda is ... just trying to impress somebody, or heard something from a buddies, brothers, uncle who had the fastest car on the block.
We have all heard your boring old rants, anything but stock is wrong.
Then there is the real world , where people enjoy modifying their cars, they realized that sometimes there are things that can be improved on from a 50-60 year old design and technology. There are people that don't care what others think , because it's their car and they are free to do with it as they please.
Not only that, there is an entire online community that also enjoys this as well. In fact, belive it or not there is a multi billion dollar aftermarket industry , that has put more money , research and effort into improving " the original system " than you will ever understand.
So if== your just coming into this thread to start another one of your pointless , unrelated rambles and throw out random useless calculations or formulas........ spare us. Your either here to help with the original question or your not.
Perhaps there is an alternator belt that needs to be calculated, so that you can go to the store and buy the same one that I measured with a piece of string
It must be difficult to go thru life with a closed mind.
"So if== your just coming into this thread to start another one of your pointless , unrelated rambles and throw out random useless calculations or formulas"
........perhaps it's just that you do not understand the engineering principles and calculations involved in making a determination or as it noted, you must subscribe to the "guess and by golly" method, rather than doing it correctly the first time....but ......it's your $$$ to waste .....which is your prerogative........there's no need to criticize my perspective just you don't understand or believe in engineering......
BOB RENTON
Please perform the celebratory burnout.My car had its original module, over 50 years and 150k miles, was working fine. I swapped because I wanted to play with an EFI system I picked up. Their instructions said I needed an ignition system that did not have a ballast resistor. Thats it. No expectations that it would add 50hp, just looking for some entertainment time from something i enjoy.
Thanks to everyone who responded with assistance. I'm up and running.
Great, what coil are you using now?Thanks to everyone who responded with assistance. I'm up and running.
Just where do you get off criticizing anything about my personality ??? Just because we have differing attitudes and aptitudes.......and, it seems as if you cannot or do not recognize sarcasm....this is not my fault.....perhaps you should learn the difference. I choose to do things and express myself differently than you......which does not make me wrong.....anymore than your opinion is the correct way. Hypocritical....ha.....perhaps, do you even know the definition of the word or its application ???? The same people keep asking the same question about the same thing.....re coil's, ballast resistors, ECUs, and what happens when they mix match components and don’t think or "out think" the engineers origional design, with something better.....as seen in some magazine article, an UNCLE TONY'S expose, then bitch when it doesn't work as expected........talk about being Hypocritical......that's it personified.......Maybe you should be preaching to that choir.......just my opinion......No need to criticize your perspective ? Did you not just come into this thread mocking the setup, and people that are involved in it?
So its ok for you to criticize? How hypocritical can u be ?
I never criticized anything, other than your personality . You want to keep your point system, all the power to ya .
Other people want to try or are interested in different setups. I know , hard to belive for someone that is " close minded. The only close minded person is the one that thinks they are always right .
Just where do you get off criticizing anything about my personality ??? Just because we have differing attitudes and aptitudes.......and, it seems as if you cannot or do not recognize sarcasm....this is not my fault.....perhaps you should learn the difference. I choose to do things and express myself differently than you......which does not make me wrong.....anymore than your opinion is the correct way. Hypocritical....ha.....perhaps, do you even know the definition of the word or its application ???? The same people keep asking the same question about the same thing.....re coil's, ballast resistors, ECUs, and what happens when they mix match components and don’t think or "out think" the engineers origional design, with something better.....as seen in some magazine article, an UNCLE TONY'S expose, then bitch when it doesn't work as expected........talk about being Hypocritical......that's it personified.......Maybe you should be preaching to that choir.......just my opinion......
BOB RENTON
Great, what coil are you using now?
Thanks for the heads up, I wasn't tracking that. I was a bit gun shy to reorder another Pertronix 44011 so I looked for one that specifically said I could use it without a ballast resistor. Hopefully the additional heat sink I added to the mount helps keep it cool. If it burns up, I have a spare and will look into alternative solutions.Hope it works for you, I have read that these modules want 0.5 resistance coil though, but I am just experimenting myself.
Bob is right, mixing/matching these ignition components is a crap shoot.
Thanks for the heads up, I wasn't tracking that. I was a bit gun shy to reorder another Pertronix 44011 so I looked for one that specifically said I could use it without a ballast resistor. Hopefully the additional heat sink I added to the mount helps keep it cool. If it burns up, I have a spare and will look into alternative solutions.
Yes. But I ended up exchanging the 40111 (1.5 ohm) for another Pertronix 44011 (0.32 ohm). After a bunch of reading last night, it seems that it should work ok with the HEI module and no ballast resistor. The reading also suggested that the 1.5 ohm coil would shorten the life of the module. I'm going to just trust that the shipping damage to my first unit was the root cause the failure of both the coil and the module. The 44011 gets installed tomorrow. I already swapped to an AC Delco D1906 HEI Module from the Delphi unit.Are talking about a heat sink for your coil or the one you added to my 3d print for the module ?