• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Which muscle car is ugly?

More

0BED8DAD-585F-403C-A78A-21EF152CF173.jpeg


7F32C0B1-FC54-4A66-A8C9-EB5343FC145A.jpeg


5F0E28A8-D6FD-4D61-8965-9FA39E28F2BB.jpeg


E3BF559E-EF0F-40AD-B415-826CA5D37C6A.jpeg


E36FB139-A757-4B1F-ABD8-750027D559DE.jpeg
 
Last edited:
I never liked the Corvair or the early Falcons. They would have to be my pics for ugly cars.

1654469440340.png


1654469530613.png
 
Not a whole lotta "Musclecars" mentioned in this thread.... Lotta ugly cars, but not Musclecars....
Don't know if the 73 chevelles, or whatever they were called are pretty ugly. Even the "ss" version. I liked the 1976 Laguna type S3. I had one, not a muscle car, but they looked pretty good.
 
I always thought the 71 Javelin looked goofy:

983B2C36-9985-4153-808D-86CE9AF0CE9B.jpeg


Conversaly, IMO the sexiest cars of the 60s were the 68-70 Charger, 67 Shelby, and mid-year Corvette. They are so exquisitely styled, they even make green sexy:

17AD023E-39E9-4CE0-8658-B1795400D180.jpeg
C4293EDA-93D8-42DA-BB1B-CD41FB836F11.jpeg

36674B5A-BC83-4D16-ADEA-3C85576B11F9.jpeg
13DCAD25-5A2C-43E2-A803-DD2BD09F5333.jpeg

515548C2-5C22-4210-A981-ADE7C75E1E4A.jpeg
EAF83C9F-99E5-4029-9634-C4F8A044B31D.jpeg
 
I always thought the 71 Javelin looked goofy:

View attachment 1342388

Conversaly, IMO the sexiest cars of the 60s were the 68-70 Charger, 67 Shelby, and mid-year Corvette. They are so exquisitely styled, they even make green sexy:

View attachment 1342395View attachment 1342396
View attachment 1342402View attachment 1342403
View attachment 1342407View attachment 1342409
The Mustang might look good, but put 4 adults in it and Big rear tires, they would rub in the fender wells on slight distortion on rough roads. Example Bullit no mods to the Charger, major to the Mustang. A lot of pretty cars made that didn’t have true grit.
 
1663122046590.png

I have always thought the gen 4 Camaro's were unappealing.
 
My '62 Savoy is considered ugly by most. I think it is as much about the reason you own it as it is the aesthetic that most judge it by.
 
The Mustang might look good, but put 4 adults in it and Big rear tires, they would rub in the fender wells on slight distortion on rough roads. Example Bullit no mods to the Charger, major to the Mustang. A lot of pretty cars made that didn’t have true grit.
The rear seat on a Mustang is a placebo. That’s why on fastbacks it’s a fold down. Better to just leave it that way.
 
I like 1967 Camaro’s and have owned two in the past. I wish I still had them both.
 


I was horrified to find out this car existed, but in retrospect it is one of the few small RWD 80's cars. It's not uglier than a base Fox body Mustang. The lines are pretty clean actually. A talented builder could turn the image of these cars around.

View attachment 1342432
I have always thought the gen 4 Camaro's were unappealing.

The styling was developed for a more cab-forward car, the FWD/AWD Camaro that GM cancelled. One of the greatest missed opportunities in automotive history IMO. The FWD/AWD Camaro drivetrain could have been carried over as the performance version of GM's FWD passenger cars. The 90's could have been a new muscle car era for GM, and those cars would be collectible today. Instead they are either crushed or living out their last days as poor people hoopties.
 
Auto Transport Service
Back
Top