• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Who Likes Aircraft ?



-I have actually flown a few missions with that bird, the RB-57
-We had 2 here in Edwards
-We were flying a couple of SDI missions in the B.I.O.T and we looked out our window and there it was, came down to take a "peep" at us.
-They were supporting a mission we were on and their role was "Upper Altitude Rocket Plume spectrography"
-FUNNY:They thought we were "odd and neat" and we thought the same about them....
-Hmm, 1986?
-September or October-ish?

BTW: for all you lay persons, B.I.O.T is The British Indian Ocean territory
We deployed from Diego Garcia, a "true TROPICAL PARADISE" HA HA!

THIS WAS MY STATION ON BOARD:
140416-F-IO108-010.JPG



ARIA:

aria 1.jpg


thM3T7UJ6D.jpg



ski.jpg
 
Last edited:
Columbia roars to life from Pad 39A on April 12, 1981. (Image number: S-81-30492).

photo03.jpg
 
ATLAS V fiery liftoff on April 14, 2018 at 7:13 p.m. EDT (2313 GMT) from Cape Canaveral’s Complex 41 launch pad.
41423251522_ade851f369_k.jpg
av_afspc11_l5.jpg
 
Earlier this year, the last Boeing 747 was retired from passenger service in the USA. This Delta "Queen Of The Skies" took off for its final departure on Jan. 3rd of this year, being the last time you had the chance to fly one of these jumbo jets on an American airline. This ends 48 years of US service that started in 1970 with Pan-Am's first 747 flight.
tp%3A%2F%2Fcdn.cnn.com%2Fcnnnext%2Fdam%2Fassets%2F180105123959-delta-boeing-747-atlanta-depature.jpg

If you want to taste a bit of old style luxury, British Airways still has 36 of these giants in their fleet. :)
 
I always wondered what the deal was with the blunt ends of the tails?

The Program Manager closed the job charge number before the engineers could finish designing the trailing edges.
:rolleyes:

____________________
Scroll down about half way after going to this link:

https://history.nasa.gov/SP-60/ch-3.html

Excerpt:
A phenomenon is encountered in which the vertical tail loses ability to stabilize the airplane and the nose tends to yaw. Indeed, the only previous airplanes that had been flown to Mach numbers above 2 - the X-1A and X-2 - had experienced such large decreases in stability that the pilots lost control (disastrously, in the case of the X-2) when they maneuvered the craft to angles of attack of only 5 or 6 degrees. Yet the reentry maneuver of the X-15 would normally require it to operate at an angle of attack of 20 to 25 degrees.

The initial solution, proposed by NACA, was found in the large, wedge-shaped upper-and-lower vertical-tail surfaces, which are nearly symmetrical about the aft fuselage. A wedge shape was used because it is more effective than the conventional tail as a stabilizing surface at hypersonic speeds. A vertical-tail area equal to 60 percent of the wing area was required to give the X-15 adequate directional stability. Even this was a compromise, though, for weight and different flight conditions. As an additional factor of safety, therefore, panels that could be extended outward, thus increasing the pressure and stabilizing forces, were incorporated in the vertical tails. These panels -another NACA proposal- also serve as speed brakes, and the pilot can use them at any time during flight. Both braking effect and stability can be varied through wide ranges by extension of the speed brakes and by variable deflection of the tail surfaces. The large size of the lower vertical tail required for adequate control at high angles of attack required provision for jettisoning a portion of it prior to landing, since it extends below the landing gear.

A disadvantage of the wedge shape is high drag, caused by airflow around its blunt aft end. This drag force, when added to the drag from the blunt aft ends of the side fairings and rocket-engine nozzle, equals the entire aerodynamic drag of an F-104 jet fighter.
 
Last edited:
The Program Manager closed the job charge number before the engineers could finish designing the trailing edges.
:rolleyes:

____________________
Scroll down about half way after going to this link:

https://history.nasa.gov/SP-60/ch-3.html

Excerpt:
A phenomenon is encountered in which the vertical tail loses ability to stabilize the airplane and the nose tends to yaw. Indeed, the only previous airplanes that had been flown to Mach numbers above 2 - the X-1A and X-2 - had experienced such large decreases in stability that the pilots lost control (disastrously, in the case of the X-2) when they maneuvered the craft to angles of attack of only 5 or 6 degrees. Yet the reentry maneuver of the X-15 would normally require it to operate at an angle of attack of 20 to 25 degrees.

The initial solution, proposed by NACA, was found in the large, wedge-shaped upper-and-lower vertical-tail surfaces, which are nearly symmetrical about the aft fuselage. A wedge shape was used because it is more effective than the conventional tail as a stabilizing surface at hypersonic speeds. A vertical-tail area equal to 60 percent of the wing area was required to give the X-15 adequate directional stability. Even this was a compromise, though, for weight and different flight conditions. As an additional factor of safety, therefore, panels that could be extended outward, thus increasing the pressure and stabilizing forces, were incorporated in the vertical tails. These panels -another NACA proposal- also serve as speed brakes, and the pilot can use them at any time during flight. Both braking effect and stability can be varied through wide ranges by extension of the speed brakes and by variable deflection of the tail surfaces. The large size of the lower vertical tail required for adequate control at high angles of attack required provision for jettisoning a portion of it prior to landing, since it extends below the landing gear.

A disadvantage of the wedge shape is high drag, caused by airflow around its blunt aft end. This drag force, when added to the drag from the blunt aft ends of the side fairings and rocket-engine nozzle, equals the entire aerodynamic drag of an F-104 jet fighter.


Amazing technology from what seemed like primitive times.
 
F-104 was awesome. The Dutch AF was still flying them when I was stationed there in 72-74. We had F-4E models. At that time I was a weapons loader 462xxx
 
On this day in history:
April 18, 1951 - Canadian James Floyd, the first non American to win the award, was presented with The Wright Brothers Award for his design work on the Avro Jetliner, which first flew in 1949.
Avro-Jetliner.jpg


Also on this day in 1958, the Avro Arrow made its 6th and 7th flights, cruising at 1,000 mph. at 50,000 feet. James Floyd was the head designer for that aircraft as well.
FWIW, James is still alive at 103 years old!
ARROW201-colourizedSMM.jpg
 
Last edited:
Auto Transport Service
Back
Top